Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hi Charles, Paulo, all,

I don't know you, Paulo, very well, but reading your postings shows me that you care for both, the Brazilian and the international LibreOffice community.

I know Charles much better - he works hard to support the LibreOffice community, he has experienced quite negative effects of words and actions in the past, first for, now for LibreOffice, and he wants to avoid such effects wherever he finds signs that might lead in this direction.

And - he tries to be quite clear in his wording, leading to the impression that he doesn't care about the perception and feelings of the people he talks to.

But what I wanted to add here in the thread is something different:

Charles-H. Schulz schrieb:

Le Wed, 11 May 2011 11:42:02 -0300,
Paulo de Souza Lima<>  a écrit :

2011/5/11 Charles-H. Schulz<>

Hello Paulo,


TDF will be satisfied when the whole community will be healthy and
able to contribute to LibreOffice.

I'm not sure what you mean with "healthy and able to contribute to
LibreOffice". I am telling you, since the begining of this mess, we
ARE healthy, contributing and doing our job. I really still don't
understand why you refuse to agree with that. The proof is in TDF
wiki and websites, but I won't insist in this matter anymore, also.
If you have a web browser and Google Translate, you can easily see it
by yourself. Do it!

Paulo: calm down. :-) don't take each of my sentences as an attack.
What I mean by a healthy community is a community that does not have
open quarrels and arguments such as... the brazilian community. You
tell me the community is healthy, but it's not so clear to me. (and
there again I have to stop commenting because it quickly stops
being TDF's business).

That's not true in my eyes.

TDF as the international LibreOffice community *is* interested in every regional team working to further LibreOffice as product and as community.

If there are issues, where the international community can help, we want to be involved. We've been telling this several times privately and on the mailing lists (e.g. after the announcement of dropping the name and switching to LibreOffice).

But our help is limited.

Interpersonal issues should be able to be solved among the people involved.

Decisions inside a local team or community about the tools they use and the way they work together should not involve the international community, unless they lead to problems in the relationship to the international community or restrictions to work with the international tools.

This has been my concern with the "wrong" mailing list (Gubros) and the "wrong" domain (

It was not clear to me (and others looking from the outside) that both are interim solutions on your way from an mostly independent BrOffice community to the Brazilian part of the international LibreOffice community.

Reading that there are people in Brazil trying to keep up their independent community without seeing the positive aspects of being part of the international community leads to sad feelings:

LibreOffice *is* international, and even if everybody is free to decide how to work and discuss, we experienced something similar in the past:

Single persons or groups tried to draw interested newcomers or community members away from this international team, towards a working area with different focus. They used our infrastructure, pointed to their mailing lists instead of the official ones and so on.

Everybody should have the chance to contribute to LibreOffice directly - neither filtered by an NGO (as BrOffice times are over, I don't need any prove or denial in this area), nor redirected to different websites or mailing lists.

That's the reason why I want to see a clear statement on the website and in the wiki describing the website as interim solution until the content has been moved to the pt-br website.

If the website would contain a heading like "we're moving the content of this site to our new home"; and the site would lead to this page too, I'm sure the Steering Committee would allow to use the external page for the time needed.

Of course you can link to resources on the interim site from each pt-br webpage (like "For more content ....., please have a look at our old website, until the migration has been finished"). I think a prominent link from the main page to might help your users not to feel lost in the transition, and this should not be a problem if the goal would be mentioned here too.

For the mailing list (Luiz told us, that you are already moving) I hope transistion is easier. I don't mind at all, if the well known list is still active.

But everybody should know that the people interested in LibreOffice and being part of the international community use the other list - like you already did for any other list, if I read the wiki right.

I want to thank you for this move showing your good will - I hope you can understand, why it is important to us, that the community resources don't point to external areas at the first place.

One word about "Colibre" as name for your local LibreOffice community:
I might be wrong, but in my impression Charles sees this as a group inside the Brazilian LibreOffice community (or even external) - with the people behind ALTA as another group, fighting each other.

If there is such a fight, we can't help much (except in supporting integrative activities). But if you want to use a different name from "Brazilian LibreOffice Community" (I can understand this as member of the even longer "Germanophone Project of"), it should be clear to you that you
1) must avoid different goals from TDF (bylaws, mission statement).
2) must stay as open and inclusive as the international community
in order to avoid the impression of being an external entity.
3) reduce LibreOffice's visibility and brand recognition by introducing a different label.

Perhaps you could avoid to promote this name until the brand LibreOffice has been established to a certain degree?

(By the way: I like the name, but this is not the topic here)

If some people who have "titles" in TDF like Olivier, Eliane e David,
don't agree with that, that's their problem, not ours. Sadly, they
think if they have those "titles", that makes them a kind of
"special" community members. They aren't, in our point of view, and
never will be.

As in one of your previous postings you refer to the TDF team page, where David is called "... the LibreOffice community representative in Brazil."

Neither Oliver nor Claudio mention such a position.

Did someone from the Brazilian community ask David to explain this sentence or to have it removed?

Well, there is no title (yet) inside TDF. There are roles and
functions. With respect to our Brazilian friends, Olivier is a member
of the SC and Claudio is his deputy.

And this recalls another concern of ours: there are 4 brazilians as
TDF members/founders.

I count 3: Claudio, David and Olivier.

  Some of them can have a whole history of
contributions to TDF, but also did a lot of disgusting things agaist
the Brazilian Community. When you consider your meritocracy, you
don't take this into consideration.

I think we do, look at our bylaws.

Perhaps a bit too short in this case:

The founders stated to work to establish the foundation several months before going public. In late 2009 nobody here knew about the problems in Brazil (if they have been already there). But it was important to include the Brazilian community in this step - as you are a large community nearly totally neglected in times.

So having three Brazilian members among the founders is not really surprising. By the way: Did you count the Germans? ;-)

Unfortunately the problems in the Brazilian community led to the current situation, where some of the SC members are not trusted any more.

But even if you think this is not fair, please take into account:
- It's just one vote among 9
- Neither Olivier nor Claudio hide their opinion if the other wants to get any decision that influences the Brazilian community. - Every community member can discuss topics he/she feels important or wrong with the entire SC on the dedicated mailing list and in the SC calls. - The SC has been established to be replaced by a Board of Directors elected by all TDF members latest one year after the launch of LibreOffice/TDF (End of September).

This is meritocracy in my eyes.

You state that they still contribute and that they are (at least partially) respected inside the Brazilian Community.

For me this sounds that they are community members - and even if they might not be trusted fully, this would only mean that the people not trusting them would have an eye on their contributions, actions and words - and pointing out, if there were something wrong.

What I can say is: None of all the SC decisions I know of have been influenced by any of the Brazilian members in a way that might affect the Brazilian community in a negative way.

[...] We have a perception that you hear too
many people who are not alingned to the community's desires, and too
less people who can give you a clearer vision of us.

I didn't notice that the SC didn't hear to any voice describing the needs of parts of our community.

Your perception is biased - understandable looking at the problems in Brazil. But the SC and the international community consist of people who are open to real and serious descriptions of situations where something went wrong and should be done better.

But the people who think that such a situation hurts LibreOffice should tell this - it is not the task of the SC or any other international community member to find such problems in the different teams and try to solve them: fortunately most of them can be solved directly inside the respective team.

[...] I suggest you consider to accept more
brazilian members, from the *real* community.

I hope you don't think, that membership applications have been rejected because they have been from people of the "wrong" part of the community!

We accept members based on their contributions only.

And as Sophie already told: most of the rejections have been done only because the applicants didn't name a community member (best: already TDF member) who could give more insight about their contributions.

We can vote and
indicate some names, if you wish, in order to make things balanced
and fairer.

No - these and all the other people should apply for membership, show their contributions and be involved in creating the new Board of Directors. They can apply for a seat too.


This should be taken in consideration when you decide to
"talk to brazilian community as a whole" as you're saying.

What I/we honestly try is to get feedback from everyone inside your

And here your mails are very important.

Thank you!

I will not be a candidate. I have submited my request a few weeks
ago. It was deferred. Something about "we couldn't confirm your
informations" or so. Maybe the person who decided it doesn't have a
web browser neither knows how to use Google translate. It doesn't
matter, I wish to give up.

Sorry, if the Membership Committee has not been clear enough how the application works.

They can't search and grab for the contribution of every applicant.

They had to deal with more than 50 requests in about two weeks - and they are volunteers like you and me, still working in other areas of LibreOffice.

They need to be pointed to the contributions - and to someone being able to support the request.

Of course it is easier, if they know the supporter, therefore someone already known as TDF member would be best.

For the last week I would be glad to be your supporter - your postings here have been non-trivial and important for the integration of the Brazilian community.

Unfortunately I can't tell about your contributions during the last three months as requested for the application (except the video in February)

But perhaps the SC member you trust is able to tell the MC about your contributions...

Best regards


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.