On 05/02/2013 03:03 AM, Mattias Põldaru wrote:
29.04.2013 17:01, Marc Paré kirjutas:
I took a look at these files. Please don't take it as much of a
criticism but friendly notes on how to improve it.
Oops! The files can be found here:
Just to be honest about the way the green logo design was started, I
[Tim L. in the USA] created the original green brochure design for my
"community based" needs that print well on my inkjet and black&while
laser printers. Then Marc Paré took that design and tweaked it. Since
I use the standard Letter size paper in the USA and most of the rest of
the world uses the A4 standard paper, we needed to have two different
versions, since the three frames/columns per size of the paper would be
To be perfectly honest, I could print my brochures in A4 but the only
paper of that size I can get is a "copy paper" quality of paper and not
any heavier weight that would be used for brochures. Also that A4 size
"copy paper" costs about three times the price of the letter size copy
paper quality of paper I can get from the same source or even locally in
the "big box" office supply stores.
Here are my remarks:
The logo on top green bar is vertically aligned to nothing. It would
be pleasing on the eye if at least the paper icon looked vertically
centered. And if possible, center text vertically as well (as done in
Are you saying that you see the green logos are not centered on the
Those logos should be centered on each panel of the brochure, except for
the panel on the far right.
The green bar on the bottom "balances" the design on the page - .i.e. it
looks better with them in my opinion.
When the content is added to the template, you should see the "logo" and
the "template text" centered in the column/frame. The actual text
content would look great using a "full justification" in its text
frame/"cell" but you have to deal with the word spacing issues and may
need to do some manual hyphenations to make it look "good". Having
content text centered, and not justified [left, right, full] does not
look "professional" in some cases and with some types of content.
As for goodlooking professional texts these usually have slightly
smaller text with greater line spacing. IMHO 10,5 pt with 120% line
spacing and 0.14 cm spacing below the paragraph looks fine. Although I
don't think I would ever use Liberation fonts myself.
The text size needs to be large enough for easy reading. Sometimes the
120% line spacing works, while others it does not. Personally, I do not
know how to set the 0.14 cm spacing after a paragraph. I tend to modify
the font size of a blank line between paragraphs to get the needed spacing.
Right now we have 3 different greens on the page (front page logo,
front page text and border). We should reduce it to one (or two, if
one has to be pale).
The 3 greens maybe an issue for some, but that is a "design" issue with
"branded" colors. The green logo is the "exact" green color of the new
splash screen and that color was used for the logo. I was not the first
to use that color.
The green of the "traditional logo" on the far right panel has been used
since the 3.3.x days.
The text color either uses "green 1" the main color uses.
Or "green 0" which is darker and sometimes looks better than green 1 for
So yes, there may be several green colors, but it is all about using the
current colors of the current logo and splash or web page colors. The
you use the best "branded" green for the readability of the text. The
darker green, for me, looks better in most situations.
As for the white first page, saving ink is a good reason. But right
now it looks kind of dull. Maybe if we would add a colorful image with
all the icons flying out of LibreOffice box or something slightly
fancy. Or use even more white (see linked file).
Yes the far right panel, i.e. front panel, does not use a background
color. It is not the saving of the ink but the look it has after you
print the color background on "standard" home/office inkjet printers.
Large blocks of a single color does not print well with all of the
different inkjets I used. I use to have a color laser, and a printed
background tended not to look "well" either in most cases I had to deal
with. Sometimes, I even had small bits of the toner "flack off" on the
"heavy weight" paper used for brochures - i.e. cover stock weights.
I downloaded your file but it does not show anything like you stated
except a single icon on the bottom of the left panel. I do not know how
"professional" icons flying out of the logo "box" would be.
The panel positions on A4 doesn't exactly match, the positions from
left should be 0,6 (was 0,51), 10,5 and 20,4 cm (was 20,48). And since
you use panels the page text column gutter is not set, otherwise it
should be double the border, 0,51 * 2 = 1,02 cm. Or was it to match up
for the space lost when folding?
I work with inches, not centimeters, in the USA. Then Marc took my 8.5
by 11 inch paper design and formatted it to A4 and cm measures. At that
point, he tweaked it and then recreated a USA Letter paper size
version. At lease that is what I think he said he was doing.
(29,7−8,71⋅3)/6 = 0,595
(29,7−8,71⋅3)/6⋅3+8,71 = 10,495
(29,7−8,71⋅3)/6⋅5+8,71⋅2 = 20,395
The borders around the sheet/page should be the same for top, bottom,
left, right. Then the spacing between columns/frames should be double
that. Then, when you fold the sheet/page you will get the same margin
on all sides of the visible panel or frame. For the Letter size paper
version, which I started with and Marc revised and made the A4 version,
I used a quarter inch border for the panels. It looked well and had
enough margins around panel/frame to fold. You have to try to get as
much content space with the smallest margins, yet keep it large enough
for the hand folding to be easily done by the people who print these
brochures in their home/office. Most people do not have a folding machine.
Since you use panels you could delete the bottom bar images and color
the panel bottom border, which would make the problem of hiding images
"hiding images? I do not know what you are talking about.
As I stated earlier, the green bar on the bottom makes the page look
more "balanced" and looks better than without it. I state that opinion
based on my testing with actual content in the brochure. That is the
only real test I use. Sure you can make a great looking design for the
document, but if it does not look good when you fill in the document's
content then you have to rethink your design. I always create a
brochure with some initial "unedited" content and then work the
document's design to complement the content and its style[s]. Once the,
in this case, brochure design with the initial content is working well,
then you can remove the content and "tweak" the brochure template. Then
I take a "finalized" version of the template and refill it with the test
content [or the exact content] and see if it still works well for its
File with these changes is here (the colors are still not right).
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy