Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: LO Writer UI Analysis

Hi Björn,

On 30 January 2013 20:18, Björn Balazs <bjoern.balazs@user-prompt.com> wrote:
> You haven't: We did an expert rating (that what I wrote - and to add
> some more flesh to it:) with two experts (Heiko and me) working
> independently and discussing were categorization differed.

Not sure if you're saying that I haven't looked careful enough or that
you haven't explained it well enough. In any case, I wasn't so much
interested in the "who?" as I was in the "how?".


> So yes, you are right - there are issues to the validity. Take it as
> I said before: it is an indicator for the mentioned hypothesis and

There are issues with the validity of your results/the methodology but
you still want to use them as an indicator for something?


> Nevertheless they are valid - mostly because people re-did what was
> done before using (slightly) different methodology.

That mostly thing is mostly the problem here: no one has tested your
study with proper methodology so far.


> Back to our study: all raw data is freely available.

Sure.


> I really hope to get some support here - we need to go ahead based on
> research (as good as we can). You see in this and other threads, what
> happens when we all just talk about our own preferences...

Emphatically, I support what you do (I believe I wrote that before) –
I just don't like this specific part of your analysis.

Astron.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted