Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Le 2011-07-06 02:13, Larry Gusaas a écrit :

On 2011/07/05 3:57 PM Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Jean, Sigrid, all,

thanks for your mails that allow me to go a step further:

Sigrid Carrera schrieb:
Hi Jean, Bernhard, *all,

On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 06:49:04 +1000 Jean Weber<jeanweber@gmail.com>
wrote:

[...]

Just for your information: the DE documentation team has voted for
the Clearlooks theme with green2 as the colour to use. I'm not very
happy with this choice, I would have preferred a "less noisy" colour
with still a good contrast, but it was a majority voting for this.
So, we're going to produce screenshots with this theme for our
documentation - and if necessary, we will provide screenshots for the
website too.

I wrote:
[...] if you think, a guideline ("we recommend ...") leading to
similar screenshots in our docs would be a good thing, please
let's define the theme, so it can be used on our wiki and we can
end this discussion.


Guidelines are good and important. I hope we can agree on some
guidelines within the whole project soon.

Yes, guidelines are good. I am all for guidelines. I have given my
opinion on the desirable look of a theme for documentation, and
I'll be away for 2.5 weeks so I won't be able to create any more
noise on this subject. I hope it's decided by the time I get back.
:-)

Based on your comments in this thread I want to start a new thread for
a vote on this topic.

People should vote *either* for a consistent theme based on Jean's
proposal: http://go.mail-archive.com/xUDsiIBlv-ZqBlXMjn971KD2YDw=

> - Clearlooks theme
> - Font: Liberation bold
> - Font size: 11 pt
> - Highlight foreground color: Libre Green 2 (#43C330)

*or* against any proposal to use a consistent theme for screenshots.

Based on this decision there should be a wiki page describing how
screenshots are recommended to be taken.

Existing screenshots should only be replaced when time allows it (for
example when the respective chapter or book is worked over).

Do we need to add anything else?

Are these options to vote on sufficient to consider the different
opinions mentioned here?

I'd like to wait for another 24 hours for comments and start the
voting tomorrow.

Best regards

Bernhard

If you adopt this proposal no one using a Mac will be able to make
screenshots for your manuals. Your documentation is already lacking in
Mac specific content, don't make it worse. The current screenshots are
very different from the appearance of LibreOffice on a Mac.

Larry

Perhaps we should look at it from another viewpoint,

"If you adopt this proposal people using GNOME/KDE will have a guide with which to take screenshots. This will now allow you time to turn your attention to the Mac and Windows platforms in order to work out a comparable theme."

We need to start somewhere, and it seems like the most logical place to start is with the Linux platform, this, due to the uncertainty over Windows "copyright" giberish and FUD.

Logically, again, the Mac users would be next in line to be served up with a LibreOffice theme. If the Mac people could take a look at the suggested guide criteria and come back with proposals, this would help out quite a bit. Many of us do not have Mac's to work out a theme, so we need to collect Mac users interested in working on this. You may be able to do like I did, I asked for help on the KDE forums (theme section). There must be somewhere one could ask on Mac forums for help as well. In the case of the Mac platform, it will take someone who owns a Mac to take the lead.

I personally, don't think it will be difficult to create the same on the Windows platform. We will probably have an easy time getting help with this from someone well versed in "theme creation".

Cheers

Marc


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.