And all this being said, LibreOffice may be developed by a "hacker culture," but it won't be used
predominantly by one (at least, so is the hope). It's helpful to users of Microsoft Office to know that the
interface will remain more or less constant no matter which computer they're using, which is why there was
such an uproar when they switched to the Ribbon interface.
I don't think anyone's trying to stifle what LibreOffice can do by asking for a uniform theme, but
we should take care that at the very least that screenshots look similar. Keep in mind that many of
the mockups being proposed in the future involve a lot of icons, which can vary dramatically from
theme to theme. Enough so, actually, that a screenshot could become entirely useless because what
you see there isn't at all representative of what's on the screen in front of you.
And Marc, what I meant in my mail was not that NeoOffice is "better" or that LibreOffice needs to
follow its footsteps, but rather that NeoOffice was an example of Mac users preferring that OpenOffice.org
integrate better with the default system themes, and choosing it as a result.
I think that the uniqueness coming from many distributions of Linux is a huge strength, but LibreOffice needs
to be different (or shown differently) for functional reasons, not just for the sake of distinguishing it
from the "corporate culture." Same goes with interface designs, for me-- but that's another thread.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.