And all this being said, LibreOffice may be developed by a "hacker culture," but it won't be used
predominantly by one (at least, so is the hope). It's helpful to users of Microsoft Office to know
that the interface will remain more or less constant no matter which computer they're using, which
is why there was such an uproar when they switched to the Ribbon interface.
I don't think anyone's trying to stifle what LibreOffice can do by asking for a uniform theme, but
we should take care that at the very least that screenshots look similar. Keep in mind that many of
the mockups being proposed in the future involve a lot of icons, which can vary dramatically from
theme to theme. Enough so, actually, that a screenshot could become entirely useless because what
you see there isn't at all representative of what's on the screen in front of you.
And Marc, what I meant in my mail was not that NeoOffice is "better" or that LibreOffice needs to
follow its footsteps, but rather that NeoOffice was an example of Mac users preferring that
OpenOffice.org integrate better with the default system themes, and choosing it as a result.
I think that the uniqueness coming from many distributions of Linux is a huge strength, but
LibreOffice needs to be different (or shown differently) for functional reasons, not just for the
sake of distinguishing it from the "corporate culture." Same goes with interface designs, for me--
but that's another thread.
--
Christopher Lee
Executive Director
Champion Debate
On Thursday, July 7, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Hi David,
Le 2011-07-07 05:43, David Nelson a écrit :
Hi Bernhard,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:57 AM, Bernhard Dippold
<bernhard@familie-dippold.at (mailto:bernhard@familie-dippold.at)> wrote:
Based on your comments in this thread I want to start a new thread for a
vote on this topic.
Well, I'm not too sure who this vote is supposed to include, nor on
whom and how it is supposed to be binding. In any case, I hope that
the contributors to the English docs team will be left to steer and
manage their own work, without anyone trying to impose ideas on them
"from the outside" (meaning from people who are not actively involved
in the actual work).
I don't know if you were part of the prior discussions on this, but the
general consensus is that the Design team is usually consulted on
matters involving matters to do with graphic design which is why we are
holding the screenshot discussion on this list. The LibreOffice project
has many tentacles but some of these tentacles do need to cooperate with
other tentacles. The design team does a good job at keeping the
LibreOffice "public face" consistent.
As to your reference again of "manage their own work, without anyone
trying to impose ideas on them > "from the outside" (meaning from people
who are not actively involved > in the actual work)." seems to be a
little negative when some of us who would like to contribute are asking
for a little more clarity in guidelines. It doesn't sound like people
would have a voice to express their opinions about a part of LibreOffice
where they would like to participate.
You can't on one hand complain that there is not enough help to update
manuals and create more documentation and then complain when people ask
for clarity and better guidelines and infer that they are butting in
where they don't belong. If growth in contributors was a problem with
OOo and that it is again rearing its ugly head with LibreOffice, then
maybe there needs to be a little tweaking here and there to help new
people join and contribute.
Or at least, is this not part of the project's hopes? Have more members
contribute?
Cheers,
Marc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
(mailto:design+help@global.libreoffice.org)
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.