Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Little problem with the Vegur font

On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 17:17 +0200, RGB ES wrote:
> 2011/4/25 drew <drew@baseanswers.com>:
> > On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:17 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> > > Hi Marc, *
> > >
> > > Marc Paré schrieb:
> > > > Hi Bernhard
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > So, should we then advise the different language marketing groups to
> > > > make use of the Mplus fonts for their design and content until the Vegur
> > > > font work is completed? Why should we just not adopt and improve on the
> > > > Mplus font set instead of Vegur? Is there a technical reason why we are
> > > > so set on Vegur?
> > >
> > > No - not technical. It's just visual / consistency.
> >
> > And the two fonts mix fairly well.
> >
> > Here is the updated file
> > http://lo-portal.us/temp/na-dvd-case-es-04-11-24c.png
> >
> > All the text has been changed to M+ 1p, with the exception of the word
> > LibreOffice on the spine which was left as Vegur.
>
> Good idea!
>
> > Needed to set the font size a tad smaller for all the other text as the
> > metrics was a bit different.
> >
> > Also, regenerated the PDF and SVG logo to be 120 px high vs 128 just to
> > give a little more emphasis to the ODF logo, and flooded the tab on the
> > PDF logo with the same red as used on the 'whatever that little diddy is
> > in the body of it..a whip?'..*smile*. (Yes I can do that, this graphic
> > is Public Domain from OpenClipart.org)
> >
> > It looks fairly good.
>
> Indeed! I'll do a first review for the later today.
> Thanks again, Drew!

Great, the GIMP xcf file is sitting in the same location - feel free to
grab it if you like - I won't touch it then, till I hear from you.




-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted