Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Little problem with the Vegur font

2011/4/25 drew <drew@baseanswers.com>:
> On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 16:17 +0200, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
> > Hi Marc, *
> >
> > Marc Paré schrieb:
> > > Hi Bernhard
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > So, should we then advise the different language marketing groups to
> > > make use of the Mplus fonts for their design and content until the Vegur
> > > font work is completed? Why should we just not adopt and improve on the
> > > Mplus font set instead of Vegur? Is there a technical reason why we are
> > > so set on Vegur?
> >
> > No - not technical. It's just visual / consistency.
>
> And the two fonts mix fairly well.
>
> Here is the updated file
> http://lo-portal.us/temp/na-dvd-case-es-04-11-24c.png
>
> All the text has been changed to M+ 1p, with the exception of the word
> LibreOffice on the spine which was left as Vegur.

Good idea!

> Needed to set the font size a tad smaller for all the other text as the
> metrics was a bit different.
>
> Also, regenerated the PDF and SVG logo to be 120 px high vs 128 just to
> give a little more emphasis to the ODF logo, and flooded the tab on the
> PDF logo with the same red as used on the 'whatever that little diddy is
> in the body of it..a whip?'..*smile*. (Yes I can do that, this graphic
> is Public Domain from OpenClipart.org)
>
> It looks fairly good.

Indeed! I'll do a first review for the later today.
Thanks again, Drew!

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted