Hi Joey, all,
sorry for a short reply, but time is precious ...
Johannes Bausch schrieb:
[...]
@Bernhard: Do you mean the bow on the first f should also point towards the
middle of the i? Or just bend exactly the same way the second f does?
The two bows should have the same curvature (just my personal opinion,
but it avoids the impression of different "f" shapes).
I raised the dot because I thought it looked better (I didn't think much
about that, to be honest). I guess I wanted to avoid bending the f bow too
much - if you leave the dot where it was and still want the f bow to point
towards it, you have to bend it very strongly which doesn't look good.
It looks different from the original Vegur "f", but a slightly stronger
bending doesn't harm the general impression in my eyes.
My example [1] reduced the distance between the second "f" and the "i"
to less than the distance between the "f", because the "i" is lighter
than the "f" (due to the white area around the dot). But this is not
necessarily the right way to go.
We can adapt the distance between "f" and "i" to the distance between
the two "f" and raise the dot without enlarging the "f" height.
This would lead to a slightly increased bending of the second "f" bow -
what should be repeated for the first "f".
Do you think this is reasonable?
Best regards
Bernhard
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-design] LibO logo (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.