Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hey all,

I really think your slight changes on the typeface improve the logo a lot

Thanks, that's really good to hear.

(aside from the question if it is already too late to change it now).

Yeah... is it? I don't know.

But for me as a ligature enthusiast the use of a ligature in the logo would
create the impression that LibO is finally capable of handling ligatures of
open type fonts - but unfortunately it is not...

Well, but on purpose having a logo without ligature only because the
software itself doesn't support it (yet) seems weird to me.

Perhaps the proper moment to change the logo as you proposed would be the
release of the LibO version that supports ligatures :)

Maybe the logo gives some incentive to a programmer to implement it ;-).

As all people take their resources off the wiki, would it be ok if I created
all the other versions (coloured, contemporary, b/w, grayscale, inverted +
different resolution pngs + eps + wmf + svg) and upload them to the wiki?


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.