2011/3/2 Bernhard Dippold <firstname.lastname@example.org>
In your reply to my last mail I understood you in a way that you wanted to
on a new proposal.
I added a third alternative (which I don't like very much). The logos on my
page are only drafts; if we decide on one of them, I'll spend more time on
it. At the moment I don't have another idea how to deal with the ligature -
do you? I'd be more than glad to try another one.
If you are not going to do so, we should bring together the different
on one wiki page, describe the advantages and disadvantages of each of
I think it would be a good idea if everyone who votes would actually also
tell what he/she dislikes about it. Can you edit my own wiki page? If so,
I'd just make a subpage.
But what we need to keep in mind: Changes being recognized by the average
user / viewer will more likely be postponed until a new major or minor
than modifications leading "only" to a more balanced, professional and
consistent visual impression.
+1, I agree. Who has the final word on that?
Your first proposal (see the tinyurl above) definitely falls in the first
Sure, it does look different, at least the "fft". And if we go for it, we
should be sure we want that ligature in our logo.
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy