On 10/05/2012 06:41 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2012-10-05 06:32, Charles-H. Schulz a écrit :
Hoping this will be the last time we discuss this on the marketing list,
and so that we can move on to actual marketing topics and work....
To be fair to Tom, this is also a recurring topic from others. So,
when I have time, if we can all agree to this, I will put together a
wiki page for reference. We can then point to the appropriate wiki
page for reference.
How does this sound?
This does not mean that I am suggesting that we not discuss it
anymore, just that we all get the facts down on paper so that we can
have a more productive discussion on this topic should it come up again.
I think a WIKI page would be a great idea.
I like the original idea of the 2 line development approach. Having a
line that is "more stable" or "for critical applications" and a new line
for "the cutting edge" development is a good idea. The practice of
marketing this concept is now happening correctly, or we would not have
the 2 line question come up as often as it seems to be.
As I have stated before, I use the 2 line model for my systems and
people I work with. I will use 3.5.6 or 3.5.7 till 3.6.4 or 3.6.5 comes
out. Then I will keep with the 3.6 line till 3.7.4/5 comes out. The
development cycle for working out all the issues that comes up with the
"cutting" or "bleeding" edge line separate from the line that is more
conservative and may be better for the "major" business user IS needed.
The key is we need a better and definitive statement on why LO is doing
the 2 line development cycle. I get why it is being done, but other are
having a problem with this development model. Big business companies
cannot afford to do such a development cycle. FOSS organizations can.
If I was going to pay my workers to develop a package, I would not do
the 2 line model, but with an all volunteer and contributor development
is can be done.
Marc, please start the WIKI page describing why LO is in a 2 line
development cycle. I hope after the page is completed there will be
less confusion about it and then it also might lead into a better
marketing "plan" for marketing the 2 line concept to the users and
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy