Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Tom, Charles,

Le 2012-10-05 08:31, Tom Davies a écrit :
Hi :)
There is already a wiki-page!  The graphic clearly backs up what i have been saying.  Presumably 
the graphic is wrong but wont get replaced and the new page will just contradict the graphic.  The 
public announcement contradicts the graphic.  So, which is true?

IF the .0, .1 and .2 release are the most stable releases then we should
1.  delete the graphic and
2.  stop having 2 branches because any work done on the older branch is clearly a complete waste of 
time.

HOWEVER!

IF, as with Debian, the .0, .1 and .2 are for early adopters, experts and people who don't really 
mind running into occasional problems and perhaps even happy to report and maybe even fix things 
then i think we should
1.  Put the older branch on the main downloads page
2.  In public announcements show-off the fact that new features have been added (and improved 
compatibility)  but just say nothing about stability because stability is irrelevant for those 
early releases.

What is the problem?  Why can't we be honest?  Why even mention anything about stability in public 
announcements!?!!
Regards from
Tom :)



============================

Charles:

I'll make sure I mention

http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan
and http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria

============================

Tom: please point me to the wiki page. I will update the page.

Also Tom, remember that for most, if not all enterprises, that moving to a different version is a big deal and the IT departments are expected to do their homework. Having two branches allows enterprises a larger choice of our product which is a good thing. Its a matter of choice. Let's get a fact filled wiki page up and then, if there is still a discussion that is warranted, it can be proposed to the membership or as a conference discussion item. If all the facts are on a page, then we can all come to the discussion table with common facts.

You are probably just getting just as frustrated as all others on this thread and it is really not going anywhere.

Cheers,

Marc


--
Marc Paré
Marc@MarcPare.com
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.