Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Cosmetic changes? (was Workflow based on master)

Yury Tarasievich <yury.tarasievich -AT- gmail.com>
Sat, 13 Dec 2014 08:03:53 +0300

Those changes, while possibly worthwhile fromen_US perspective, are not related to whatlocalised interface looks like. Since version 2the workload in ui strings might easilyconstitute +100% of initial 25k. Did the uichange that much? No.


Yury

On 12/13/2014 03:22 AM, Khaled Hosny wrote:

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:00:45PM +0000, Michael Bauer wrote:

the nonsense around cosmetic changes to en-US


As a localiser, I find it worrying that “localisers” think that using
correct capitalisation or punctuation marks “nonsense cosmetics”, really
scary. I can understand people being annoying about changes in source

...

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Workflow based on master (continued)

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.