Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Belarusian/Belorussian translation

2011.03.04 10:09, Yury Tarasievich rašė:
> On 03/04/2011 09:40 AM, Dwayne Bailey wrote:
> > On 2011-03-04 09:14, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> ...
> > > description of the .PO based L10N process. Pootle isn't acceptable for
> > > the languages with the comparatively weak terminological base . In
> > > such cases it's common for everybody to translate "just as one sees
> ...
> > We have many African languages who also have weak terminology that
> > benefit from using Pootle.
> >
> > The difference is that they include their terminology in the terminology
> > project on Pootle. You can do that also, in which case people giving
> > suggestions and translations are guided by the teams terminology lists.
>
> The big problem is this procedure isn't well visible or integrated. 
> E.g., one may easily bypass it or ignore it. Also, the terminology 
> matching isn't as quite clear-cut process as many tools make it to 
> look (Pootle, too, as far as I can understand -- I know Pootle only 
> superficially). E.g., is there a support for the context variants 
> (translate as A1 in context C1, as A2 in C2 etc.)?

Yury,

Pootle does not check your translation against terminology. It's the 
other way around: it suggests terms from the terminology when you do the 
translation.

Rimas


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***