Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:26:25 -0700
Ken Springer <> wrote:

Maybe there should be a queue, and fixed on a FIFO basis.
That would be a terrible idea, at least without some prioritisation.
Otherwise you'd have periods of just catching up on myriad small bugs
while big issues languish.

But, if you can't/won't/don't  get all of the bugs squashed with the
resources you have, then you need to step back and reassess the
Why? Why must absolutely *all* the bugs be squashed before you
continue? Then there'd probably be no forward progress and we'd have a
bunch of people complaining about LO being years behind everything
else, and nobody would be using it.

As I said earlier, it's better to do a few things well, than a lot of 
things poorly.
Then, by definition, you don't want an office suite...

To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.