On 11/12/13 8:50 AM, John Meyer wrote:
On 11/11/2013 11:33 AM, Ken Springer wrote:
After using LO for awhile, I found and filed a couple of bugs/issues. I
wanted to contribute in the area of reporting issues, but I don't have
the knowledge to fix them. I didn't expect those problems to go to the
head of the line. But I *did* expect them to be put in the queue and
What I didn't like was being told my issues were not important. BS!
It's important to me.
Let's say you have a car, and every 4th time you go to use it, it won't
start. You take it to your mechanic, and each time you do, he tells you
"it's not important, he's got bigger problems to solve". Are you going
to continue to take it to that mechanic, or are you going to find a
You didn't provide links to the bugs that you provided, so I really
can't tell if they're crashes every 4th time you start, "I don't like
where the mirror is placed", or something in between problems.
It never occurred to me someone would want the bug numbers. <G>
there is a right way to tell the customer that the issue is either not
one that you get to at this moment or that the majority prefer the
solution solved another way (usually it involves a suggestion of an
But even though you treat the customer as if they are always right, that
does not mean that they are always right. Some things the customer is
Indeed, sometimes they are wrong. But, if you want them to return, they
are always right. :-)
Some things are out of budget for LO, and some things are
just preferred to be done another way. The choice has been put in your
court. You can use LO or you can find another office suite that meets
your needs depending upon the issue.
As I've posted, I am looking for an alternative, and have "candidates".
The best thing about LO is that
you don't have to drop one to take on another. And not even Microsoft
or Adobe would drop everything and start changing code just because one
user wants a change.
Changes are one animal, fixes are another.
Any company that did that would soon find itself
Mac OS X 10.8.5
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging users: initial results of the survey · Robinson Tryon
[libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging users: initial results of the survey · Ken Springer
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging users: initial results of the survey · John Meyer
- Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging users: initial results of the survey (continued)
Re: [libreoffice-users] Engaging users: initial results of the survey · Ady
- [libreoffice-users] Re: Engaging users: initial results of the survey · Ken Springer
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy