Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index

And here is the best bit:
--- Comment #42 from Björn Michaelsen <>
2012-08-16 16:58:22 UTC ---
Seeing you boasting here:

that you knew you are creating extra work for the volunteers on the QA
team with intend is really disgusting given the workload of this team.

Also note that the version is clearly documented to be _first_ version
showing the bug:

Even if it wasnt documented: If you take a moment to think about this,
there is also no other way the version field can be used: If the bug is
not present in the latest release the bug is closed anyway. If the bug
is present in the latest release, the bug is open and and the only
relevant information is: since when?

Please refain from continuing with abusive behaviour like the one you
are boasting about. I dont think repeating such behaviour is going to be

For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.