Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 20:05 -0500, V Stuart Foote wrote:
It is pretty rare for specifics of bugs to be entered on the Users
list, where there might have a passing comment that a bug would be or
had been filed. But often no additional details of the bug in the
discussion. But, that said, the threads are pretty descriptive.

        I'm sure.
Being a new subscriber, maybe the Nabble web interface would be of use
to efficiently identify substantive issues that may have associated

        I saw that, and I saw only Leif's bug linked there, in a monster thread
of vagueness. It is hard to justify dedicating the time to try to
reverse engineer people's names into bugzilla queries to dig out exactly
what bug they're talking about indirectly; and it's difficult to grok
the thread thus far. Better to ask for help - hence my request :-) so
here goes again:

        If you have a bug that you're particularly concerned about having been
marked NEEDINFO / RESOLVED INVALID, can you mail me a link ?

        At least - it doesn't seem a good use of my time, when I could be
fixing bugs, reviewing patches etc. - I was hoping that some volunteer
might help me by building a list of the specific issues; so I can trawl
through them and get down to the grist of the technical issues fast.
That of course, is an ask not -that- different from asking people to
check if their bugs are still relevant vs. the latest version.

        All the best,


--  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.