Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


In news:j39a1l$oeo$1@dough.gmane.org,
NoOp <glgxg@sbcglobal.net> typed:
On 08/26/2011 10:14 AM, Twayne wrote:
In news:4E577895.1020607@krackedpress.com,
...

As for releasing software with "bugs", this is normal,
even with MS products.

But MS fixes their bugs and will continue to do so until
2014 in my case. I am trying to get them to think about
the problem that lost them a lof of people in OOo, most
of which are still in LO, and if you read over to
Alexander's post to me, there seems to be no plans to
pick up the bugs and fix them. They're dangerously close
to repeating OOo's mistakes. LO is better IMO but what
it does not do is what it says it'll do.

  Many bugs are found in real world
testing that happens on some systems, but not others.
When these bugs are reported, they are placed on some
type of "bug needing to
be fixed list".

According to Alexander, no, that's not so. Again, see
his post to me. Devs only want to write new code, not
fix code, apparently not even their own.

On the OOo releases list you could nominate a bug as a
'blocker' on the list. LO doesn't have the same (that I'm
aware of), but they do have a 'most annoying bug' bug
report for releases going forward. As far as I can tell
anyone can add to that bug report with their own bug
report addition. See:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361
[LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs]
<quote from first comment>
This is the Meta issue to track most annoying bugs for
the release of LibreOffice 3.5.x releases. It helps
developers to concentrate on bugs that are important for
users. Also it helps users to be aware of potential
problems.

If anyone wants to raise an Bug for the release, please
add the Bug ID as dependent Bug here to the Meta Bug in
field "Depends on". Additionally please leave a comment
here why you think that the bug should be privileged.

See also
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
and http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan
</quote from first comment>

So if you've a particular bug that you'd like to see
fixed add it there... of course after first reading:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Release_Criteria
That does include information on blockers, but I've not
found any wiki pages on 'most annoying bug' criteria
(yet). So I reckon that until someone defines the MAB
criteria, add your MAB to 37361.

...

Thanks, Noop; I'll look into that tomorrow.

Twayne` 




-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.