Here is a marketing question that came from this thread;
If we do not capture a large market and following - larger the better -
what will happen to LO's market share when AOO comes out and they spend
the marketing dollars that LO does not have?
For this year, LO was lucky. Without OOo producing a package after
3.3.0, LO started to get OOo people looking for a package that is
continuing to update its package. I truly wonder how many OOo users LO
got because OOo was no longer issuing updates. When AOO comes out, how
many will switch back?
Then there is the question on how do we keep our users instead of them
going back to the "original" version, not under Apache? Right now,
open-source users have an older OOo version and the much more developed
LO package. LO is the only way to go is you want to use the best MS
Office compatibility. That was a major issue with the older OOo. That
is currently LO's biggest feature with our marketing, besides the
price. LO now can read/write .docx documents [and the other formats]
better than any other free alternative that I know of. If you do not
have a MS document/spreadsheet/etc. filled with complex micros, you can
use LO with all your old MSO documents and create all of your new ones
as well. This seems to work with everything but Access [so I have read
in these lists].
LO needs to gain marketing shares and do such a good job at explaining
why people and businesses should use our product, when AOO comes out, we
will have a market share that is very happy with out product and will
not be too willing to try AOO. When it finally does come out, we need
to make sure our package is still the better one. All of the initial
articles stating that LO 3.3.0 was much better than OOo 3.3.0 went to
our favor. Now we do not need to have articles saying AOO is now better
than LO.
So
ramp up marketing to get more loyal users
ramp up services to keep them loyal
When AOO comes out, we need to be the better product by a big margin.
They can send a lot of cash with marketing, while LO cannot. We to keep
growing and marketing at every event and show available. We to get the
public to back out package to the point that they will not go to a big
company's version. Now the work really begins.
On 10/18/2011 06:03 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 18 October 2011 10:53, Charles-H. Schulz<
charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
Hello Ian,
2011/10/18 Ian Lynch<ianrlynch@gmail.com>
I don't think you have to hand over your copyrights at ASF; but the
licence
allows anyone to take your contribution and turn it into proprietary
software.
Which is a consideration everyone should take seriously. There is a clear
philosophical issue there. On the other hand, if you want a standard like
.odf to proliferate as widely as possible - a real goal for marketing...
Apple has spread the BSD code more than desktop GNU/Linux from all the
distros.
Thank you Ian. Please do not take my following comment as a refusal to
discuss, but I'd like to keep this marketing list as a list for marketing
LibreOffice, and not as a general discussion list (but you can have this
discussion on discuss@, of course).
I thought it was relevant to marketing since the license is likely to affect
proliferation. Of course there is then a tension between philosophy and
marketing benefit and the judgement might well be that philosophy is more
important.
Also I'd say if ASF has a weakness it is that most of their product line has
never needed marketing in the same way as an end-user product has. That is
where marketing strategies might differ, both because of the license and
because of different culture. From an objective point of view communities
might learn from each other as to which aspects within their own sets of
constraints are most effective.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.