On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Nino Novak <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On 25.08.2014 19:09, Robinson Tryon wrote:
What can we do to recruit more people to help with translations?
For me (an occasional translator) the biggest hurdle is the technical
overhead needed for some of the translations. Somebody like me, who just
wants to translate a page or correct some errors - being forced to learn
pootle (or similar tools) prevents me from "just starting".
I haven't really used pootle much, but it does seem a bit quirky.
There are a number of things we could do to improve translations. To
hop over to another piece of infra for a moment, getting the
Translations extension installed on the TDF wiki will hopefully be a
good step forward:
Therefore in my eyes, a simpler workflow could substantially improve
crowd-sourcing of help file translations / corrections. Example:
- present an "edit" or "translate" button on every page or even paragraph
(could / should? be restricted to registered users)
Restricting edits to logged-in users is a good approach to
spam/griefers, even if the content is reviewed before inclusion.
- transmit the diff of such a user-made change to a group of reviewers with
- make it easy to integrate the changes back into the original page (e.g.
by buttons "accept" / "edit" / "dismiss" (if spam etc)
- make history visible (e.g. like in Wikis) so that everybody can see, who
has contributed what
These all seem like they could be helpful improvements to Pootle. Some
of them (e.g. making history visible) seem like they might not take a
ton of development work. Does the Language team chat with the Pootle
developers at all? Are they receptive to suggestions/enhancement
... well, that's just a proposal that came into my mind while reading your
question. Easy to request but heavy to implement, I suppose ;-)
Some things might take more work, such as adding in a completely new
review system, but others might be more straightforward.
Once the Translations extension is installed in MediaWiki, it would be
great if you could give some feedback about the way that it works. I
believe that it integrates a number of features you mentioned
including history and a mechanism for review. I'm not suggesting that
MediaWiki could replace Pootle, but perhaps one tool might help to
inform and improve another.
QA Engineer - The Document Foundation
Volunteer Coordinator - LibreOffice Community Outreach
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy