On 06/03/2012 11:25 AM, Mirek M. wrote:
2012/6/3 Jean-Francois Nifenecker<jean-francois.nifenecker@laposte.net>Le 31/05/2012 21:29, Kohei Yoshida a écrit :There is another reason for that. Document not only store its content but also view properties, but a change in the view properties doesn't trigger a document modified status. Here, view properties include things like (in case of spreadsheet) active sheet, cursor position, zoom level etc. But quite often you want to store the view properties after they've changed, and always enabling the save action allows this. Disabling the save action when the document content is unchanged even though the view has changed is IMO quite unfriendly in this regard. Also, it's IMO wrong to trigger a document modified status on view change.I beg to differ. A document is either changed and needs saving or is not and... doesn't. Conversely, if changing a property needs saving, then the document *is* changed.+1
It's not a matter of opinion, but of technicality. Any software that deals with complex documents is designed this way, and that's not going to change it.
Not to mention changing this principle would basically means that you are writing a new app from scratch, since everything else is built on this principle in our code base. I for one am not interested in such effort.
That's all I have to say. If people still don't see my point after this, then I suggest we agree to disagree, and avoid further wasting time on this topic.
Peace, Kohei Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted