Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Joed

On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 09:03 -0400, jlopez777 wrote:

On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 12:29 AM, planas <jslozier@gmail.com> wrote:

Hillar

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 22:51 +0300, Hillar Liiv wrote:

Hi,

Some mockups:
http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/msg01239.html

MS Office 2008:
http://img.skitch.com/20071014-b85qcwy28rw32d69qjpy8yhtyx.jpg

Ans so on...

And people if you are bashing ribbon then please tell us how much
experience
you have with it (saw pictures, used it, used it one month and ...).

Hillar



2011/5/24 jlopez777 <jlopez777@gmail.com>

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Zaphod Feeblejocks <
zaphodfj@gmail.com
wrote:

On 23 May 2011 at 9:57, Christopher Stark wrote:

Hi,

as I mentioned earlier, the main argument against ribbons is that
in M$
Office the user has to click on ribbons/tabs all the time and never
knows if the required functions hide behind "Review", "Insert" or
"Design"...

My annoyance with ribbons is:
- In MSO 2003 / LibO, I can easily see the things I expect to be in
the
top
toolbar - font information and so on.
If I perform certain other functions (e.g. tables), another floating
toolbar appears.

- In MSO 2007/10, going into tables causes a big menu all about
tables to
obscure the things I want to see on
the menu, with a lot of options I am not one bit interested in.
 Also,
the
buttons are SO inconsistent - different
sizes, some have text and some do not, etc.

In fact, the Ribbon reminds me of 'modern art'.  It's a piece of junk
and
if anyone else designed it,
commentators would call it junk.  But because Microsoft say it is
'good',
lots of people who should know better
agree with them.

The MSO ribbon is crap.  While I love Open Source and LibO, I would
either
stay on LibO 3.3 forever, or go to
WordPerfect if LibO mimicked that horrible interface.


All this makes working with the current solution in my opinion much
more
efficient than with ribbons

Absolutely.  If I wanted stupid ribbons cluttering the place, I would
be
using MSO.  I'm not using it because the
interface stinks.  OTOH, if someone developed an implementation of
ribbons
that was so good, and showed
that the idea is fine and that MS have simply done a bad job of
developing
it, that would be another matter.

In another email, Sveinn í Felli suggests an optional vertical
toolbar -
possibly a far more sensible option,
especially as so many people have wide screens nowadays.


What would be the best way to look into this? Getting some mock ups?
 Even
if it becomes an "extension" of some sort not default. I would really
like
to explore this idea. Any help or direction would be appreciated.



ZF.
--
Zaphod

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot
be
deleted




--
Joed Lopez

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



I have to use MS Office at work with ribbons, about 1 1/2 years. I think
they are attempt at making more options readily accessible to more
users. The problem is not all the options are accessible using the
default ribbon, you have to customize the top menu bar. If there is a
way to combine the idea behind the ribbon, eacy access for most options
and make other options available "on demand" we will probably have a
winner.

My other specific criticism is the some of the ribbon combinations seem
awkward to me, they do not seem to fit together. I have noticed this in
Excel mostly but some in Word. I am one to try a new ideas for the
interface and try have specific observations than complain about it
because it is different.


I agree, everyone is entitled to their own opinion but I rather keep the
conversation going toward exploring alternatives and getting some type of
advancement of ideas. Thanks Jay.



--
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted




-- 
Joed Lopez


I think we should try understand the motivation behind the ribbon. If it
is a valid issue then try to come up with our own solution.

If I remember correctly MS stated the power users probably would not
like the ribbon but most users would find it presented more options in
an accessible and easy to understand manner. The goal was to make the
non-power user more aware of the available commands and thus make them
more productive. The power users tended to customize the tool bars in
earlier versions while non-power users were often unaware that they
customize the tool bars.

If we could find a way to please both groups without alienating either
we would have a winner. I agree MS made a mistake of putting the ribbon
on the top, on the side would be better for most Westerners on the left
would probably be preferred. In other cultures that are not left to
right it could be placed on the left by checking the default language
setting.  Also, some method of customizing the ribbon with pop up menus,
custom tab, etc. would be appreciated. MS did make all the commands
accessible through the ribbon and make it more of a pain to customize
the available menus. 

Ubuntu's use of the side for the main tool bar with Unity I think is a
good idea, most people have wider screens than the paper width they
normally use. 
-- 
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.