[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMS


Hi Marc,

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:31 PM, Marc Paré <marc@marcpare.com> wrote:
> Le 2010-10-20 11:52, Christian Lohmaier a écrit :
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Benjamin Horst<bhorst@mac.com>  wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Benjamin Horst<bhorst@mac.com>  wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 18, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Benjamin Horst<bhorst@mac.com>
>>>>>>  wrote:
>> [...]
>> I know I'm repeating myself, but still the drupal site doesn't cut it.
>> You canot create structured documents with headings for example.
>>
>> Yes, I know, this is "just a configuration setting"; but despite admin
>> logins being available know, nobody took the time to add it, despite
>> so many drupal people advocating it here on the list.
>
> In my opinion, Christian does have a point here. Could someone please create
> this as proof that it can be done? I'll take a look at it although I am more
> adept at the Zikula packages. Also, in all fairness, Christian, you should
> log into the Drupal site and attempt to create these documents to see how
> they compare to Silverstripe.

Are you kidding me? Do you think I write that the drupal demo sucks
because I never ever logged into it?
I say it sucks *because* I logged in, tried it, found that it severely
lacks the features laid out as requirements, but *still* people keep
on saying that you can do everything with drupal because there are
tons of modules, because it is so flexible.

*STOP WITH THAT* - that is not questioned at all!!!!
Instead of wasting so much time praising drupal, put that time into
making the demo usable.
What you delivered so far is a joke. Yes, I mean it. If you try to
promote drupal with that POS, then sorry, you absolutely missed the
point.

Only now, after so many days have passed people start to turn the demo
into something workable. Now I see a little progress in this direction
at least.

But still workflow stuff is missing, you cannot compare revisions of
the pages, there isn't an obvious way to create links to other pages
on the site, etc. Come on!

I apologize for the wording, but apparently just writing it in nice
word doesn't help. I fell like a dump robot writing the same stuff
over and over again, without people listening.

ciao
Christian

--
E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Follow-Ups:
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSKeith Williams <kwilliams@thoughtfarmproductions.com>
References:
[libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMS"Andre Schnabel" <Andre.Schnabel@gmx.net>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSBenjamin Horst <bhorst@mac.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSChristian Lohmaier <lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSBenjamin Horst <bhorst@mac.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSChristian Lohmaier <lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSBenjamin Horst <bhorst@mac.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSChristian Lohmaier <lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSBenjamin Horst <bhorst@mac.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSChristian Lohmaier <lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSMarc Paré <marc@marcpare.com>
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.