Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Pawel,

Le 2013-02-04 10:10, Pawel Konefal a écrit :
Hi Marc, all,

I'm already PL NL maintainer. Few minutes ago I've finished translating
feature page. I don't want to talk about HTML code, because fixing this
requires complete CMS rework. You are doing great job. Feature page has
nice set of info.

I wonder, why we are using "Gb" (gigabit) instead of popular "GB"
(gigabyte)? I've noticed it on features and system requirements page. Bits
everywhere.
E.g. we are buying 512 Mb RAM memory or 512MB?
Shouldn't we use "MB"/"GB"?

And next thing, what about "msoreg" parameter, which was on system
requirements page? Does it still exists?

Greetings,
Paweł


====================

My apologies if I my message sounded like I was upset. I was not. I was interested to see if you could make the Polish site's "4.0 Features" page work better. We should all be helping each other and passing along the information. There is no reason to wait for the EN version to lead on projects; if the Polish team has a better way of building pages on SilverStripe, then go ahead on your nl site and let us know how well it works.

BTW ... Have you tested your 4.0 features page on Chrome? The cell borders do not show. It would be nice if you could find the solution to the problem with this. The table cell borders show fine in IE and FF but not in Chrome.

If you can fix this problem on your "4.0 Features" page, it would be nice to hear how you did this and we could all fix our pages. :-)

====================

Re "GB" or "Gb" ... if you find problems with some of the text, you should be submitting a report on bugzilla and someone on this list will fix it (them). This is how we normally fix the problems with text.

If it is with what particular term we should be using, then, we need to coordinate with the docs team. Our terms should be the same they are using in the EN docs.

But, yes, consistency is important.

====================

Re: "msoreg" could you also submit this as a bug report, it will need more information? I am not sure what problem you are referring to.

====================

Re: reworking the whole site -- as far as I know, there has not been a call for this at all. There is a FR team putting together a landing page for the 4.0 release day and perhaps a couple more associated pages, but, our regular libreoffice.org site will remain the same. There is no "remake" of the site on the "to-do" list.

Re-doing the site would involve all of the communities with their subsites, and, also be quite a big job. At this point, we are more concerned with going from our present version of SilverStripe to the newest stable version of SilverStripe. I think this is on Christian's and Erich's to-do list.

Let me know if you need more information.

Cheers,

Marc

--
Marc Paré
Marc@MarcPare.com
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.