Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


This is utterly maddening.

Based on Pedro's post, I ran a simple test. I created a document in Word (.docx) and an identical document in LibO (.odt). I saved them both and then extracted their contents using 7-zip Manager. I was amazed at how similar the two document contents were, and yet how different. Neither document had any of the binary smilie faces I've come to expect by opening a .doc document in a text editor. All of the individual files contained formatting codes in simple text. And, yet...

The maddening part is how two programs can create the same type of documents (xml files saved in a zipped format) and yet remain so completely different.

I found similar results when I tried saving .rtf files with different word processors. They all claimed to be .rtf, and in fact, were .rtf, yet they were all different.

But, MS knows how to market its products. Programs need something to set them apart from other similar programs, and office suites are getting to the point that any decent suite will be able to perform the same tasks as the others. LibO is set apart by being free (both in $ and in license restrictions). MS can't compete head to head with that model, so the only way it can set itself apart is by maintaining some uniqueness in its file format. The only reason people buy MS is because everybody else buys MS. If it fully adopted the .odt format, there would no longer be a reason for people to buy MS. Unless it had some killer feature, it would die and LibO would win.

I sense that a similar future lies for either Apache OO or LibO. Right now, the two programs are very similar and use the same file format. I use both programs interchangeably, sometimes forgetting which one I have open. My guess is that, at some point, either Apache or LibO will become different enough and so clearly superior that the other will fade away. That may be the hazard of having a truly open and standard file format. It eliminates a program's ability to survive.

Virgil

Virgil



-----Original Message----- From: Pedro
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 9:05 AM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: [libreoffice-marketing] Good Article for LibreOffice

Hi Tom, all

Let me be the "Devil's advocate" for a moment...


Tom wrote
MS keeps claiming that is what their new format is all about.  They
claimed it with Rtf which they no longer develop which fits their pattern
for gradually dropping completely and they are claiming it again with
their DocX and all.

RTF is plain text with format codes. So it is true that you can open it even
in a text editor. Even if it is discontinued, it is not encrypted.
Docx is exactly the same as ODT. A Zip container which stores objects such
as images, formats and the actual text in a XML file.


Tom wrote
Given that ODF 1.0 and 1.1 still open in LO, AOO and all the rest it looks
like ODF might achieve the promise, especially given that "contents"
written in Xml can be opened and read.

The same applies to MS Office. You can always open previous MS files in a
newer Office version.

As explained above ODF follows the same logic as OOXML ;)
In both cases you need to have some program that opens the zip container in
order to have access to the XML file which contains the text.

Cheers,
Pedro



--
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Re-libreoffice-marketing-Good-Article-for-LibreOffice-tp4020703p4021203.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.