On 11/19/2012 07:49 AM, VA wrote:
The truly maddening part is that, if more people used LibO, then the
.ODT format would become "standard" and MS would be relegated to
irrelevance.
So, Office wins because corporations buy it, making its file format
"standard," which forces the rest of us to conform.
It's absolutely crazy.
Virgil
ODF formats are the international standard so technically MS is not
being standards compliant. This may be very useful if someone where to
sue MS for monopolistic practices.
-----Original Message----- From: Tanstaafl
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2012 7:32 AM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: OpenOffice to be dumped in
Freiburg ?
On 2012-11-19 6:54 AM, M Henri Day <mhenriday@gmail.com> wrote:
2012/11/19 Tanstaafl<tanstaafl@libertytrek.org>
<snip>
I don't see this happening any more. Microsoft is on a roll now, coming
out with new versions *far* more often than they used to (which
means they
can 'improve' the file formats much more often). My understanding is
they
are actually pushing ultimately to a subscriptions based model - but
this
could end up being good news, because imnsho, dong this could
actually back
fire on them though (fingers crossed)... when I discussed this with my
boss, he commented that the day Microsoft *forces* us to have to
'renew'
our licenses annually is the day he will never upgrade again (just
stay on
whatever version we currently have until the world ends).
Subscription based models are probably better for the vendor not the
user over the life of the product. I suspect the fees will be charged
monthly instead of annually to lower the sticker shock and even out cash
flow.
Implicit in this model is that users will being using the "Cloud" to
access the programs rather than having it installed on their machines.
This raises another set of issues about the "Cloud" versus local
installation.
An excellent exposition of the methods used by Microsoft to «protect»
its
«intellectual property» - more accurately described as using its
quasi-monopoly to exclude others from the market....
There is one more hing that could turn this around - if the EU (or some
other major governmental entity) were to engage in and win an antitrust
lawsuit against Microsoft and force them to *fully* document their file
formats, as happened with their Windows Server SMB protocols (which I
understand has benefited the Samba project immensely).
--
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.