Re: [libreoffice-users] Indexing for Search not working?

Thanks for the "Board-discuss" tip. I'll check it out. Actually, I was just 
responding to your earlier post about features vs. stability. Didn't mean to 
abuse the user list.

I just tried renaming the user profile. It didn't fix the RTF issue. I 
checked Bugzilla and found a whole host of RTF import bugs reported, so my 
guess is that there is some issue there. It's not a huge issue for me, so 
I'm not going to worry too much about it.

Virgil



-----Original Message----- 
From: Tom Davies
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 4:50 PM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org ; VA
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Indexing for Search not working?

Hi :)
Board-discuss might be a better place to post this sort of thing. 
Copy&paste is good.

Ubuntu are extending their LTS (Long Term Support) from 2 years to 4 or even 
5.  Apparently it's impossible to set-up LO for even 1 years worth.

The Rtf issues sounds weird.  Have you tried renaming your User Profile?
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/UserProfile
Regards from
Tom :)


--- On Wed, 17/10/12, VA <cuyfalls@hotmail.com> wrote:

From: VA <cuyfalls@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Indexing for Search not working?
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Wednesday, 17 October, 2012, 20:06

As a user (and by no means a developer), I'm constantly doing battle with 
the features vs. stability issue. I agree that new features need to be 
pursued to keep LO competitive. I also agree, however, that LO is 
full-featured enough that users are justified in expecting a stable program. 
There's nothing more frustrating than finding that the program just won't 
complete a task because of some bug.

As writing is my thing, I currently have five word processors installed on 
my Windows computer. I use them all at various times due to inconsistencies 
in either features or stability. I would like to simply commit to one 
program, but no matter which direction I go, I run into either a lacking but 
necessary feature or an unstable feature that simply doesn't work. For 
example, I use the following:

Atlantis (shareware, $35.00 registration) -- Extremely stable, but lacking 
features I often need (PDF export, tables, etc.). However, it has a very 
clean  interface and the best e-book exportation that I've seen anywhere. 
The Atlantis folks are slow to publish upgrades, but when they do, they are 
relatively bug-free and accompanied by very detailed instructions on how to 
use new features.

Microsoft Word Starter -- Came with my laptop OS. I only use it when I need 
100% Word compatibility.

Lotus Symphony -- Lacking in many, many features, but one I really like is 
the tabbed interface, a feature I wish LO would adopt.

LibreOffice 3.5.6.2 -- Overall, it works well, but I discovered this morning 
that, if I try to open an RTF file, every line in the entire file is 
centered and I lose all paragraph breaks. I end up with one, centered 
paragraph. When I open the same file in Apache OpenOffice or Lotus Symphony, 
it loads perfectly. I have no idea if this is a bug in LO or a setting issue 
or a problem with my computer. But, until I figure it out, I need to use 
another option when loading RTF files. This type of continuously having to 
chase down solutions to weird problems is frustrating. Thus user list makes 
life a lot easier.

Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 -- I've noticed that AOO seems to hyphenate my 
English(USA) words at the wrong locations. I haven't had that problem with 
LO, but I don't know why. So, if I want to open an RTF file, I need to use 
AOO, but if I want to edit that file and hyphenate it, I need to load it 
into LO, after first saving it in AOO to ODT format.

This is the type of juggling act we users end up doing as we bounce from one 
program to the next trying to find the features we need and avoid the bugs 
that bog us down.

I don't envy open source developers. They do a seemingly thankless job, and 
I often wonder what keeps them motivated, other than an apparent shared 
disdain for MS. However, I deeply appreciate all they do in their attempt to 
make LO the best program available, in terms of both features AND stability.

Virgil


-----Original Message----- From: Tom Davies
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 5:51 AM
To: Dr. R. O Stapf
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Indexing for Search not working?

Hi :)
I think we both want the same thing.  The question is how to get it.

1.  How to encourage new devs to join?  At the moment we show LO as an 
exciting projects for devs to get involved with and quickly see the results 
of their work getting out there into the real world.  As a result they are 
likely to get into fixing any unexpected problems or side-issues that might 
have cropped up.

2.  We need a "stable branch" where new stuff never gets added, just fixes 
back-ported from the newer, more exciting branch.

That is pretty much what we have already.  By the time the newer branch 
reaches around .4 then it's usually stable enough for everyone = about as 
stable as the .6 or .7 of the older branch but with better compatibility 
with non-native formats and some interesting things.

If some of us helped the devs more by posting bug-reports earlier then we 
might be able to help them push that stability in earlier.  We might start 
finding the 3. or even the .2 starts to be the one stable enough to migrate 
our colleagues and co-workers to as well as ourselves instead of having to 
wait for the .4.

It's on us more than the devs.  They are working hard and need our support 
rather than our criticism.  Do we want to push devs away unless they only 
get involved with boring dry stuff and no reward, no chance of showing off 
prowess, no chance of getting recognition out there?

I like people in here too.  I also enjoy arguing with people i like and 
respect that have a good point of view and a good way of looking at the 
world.  I usually take good points from here and then argue in favour of 
them on the marketing list because you have very valid points here.

We do need an LTS because these frequent upgrades and uncertainty are just 
not possible when you have more than a handful of computers to maintain or 
have limited download, or ....  Well, tons of valid reasons
Regards from
Tom :)



--- On Wed, 17/10/12, Dr. R. O Stapf <reinhold@stapf-online.com> wrote:

From: Dr. R. O Stapf <reinhold@stapf-online.com>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Indexing for Search not working?
To: "Tom Davies" <tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Wednesday, 17 October, 2012, 9:42

It's not falling behind in development. It's about stability and
  this means productivity.It's like placing an always stronger engine in an 
F1 car without
  considering to get the power on the road. What means the best engine
  when the suspension is not strong enough. With other words I feel I
  spent a lot of time in this forum which are reducing my productivity
  time. I don't mind being in the forum because there are nice people
  here and I like to read the various opinions.)I don't know how many devs 
are working on new functions and how many
  on bug fixes. It would just be good to change for a certain time the
  ratio of devs working on bugs.Do we want it or not we are compared 
against MSO. But in MSO we
  don't know the bugs.... MS neglects them.On 17.10.2012 17:07, Tom Davies 
wrote:
Hi :)Ok, so we should just get rid of or push away any devs
            that are interested in adding new functionality.There
            are a lot of other projects they could go to for that sort
            of excitement.We could build-up a strong core of devs
            that focus only on fixing things that already exist.Get
            rid of any that have too much imagination.We could watch and 
wait while other Office Suites develop
            new functionality and then try to catch up and try to
            write code to do the same thing but without the code
            looking too similar.They would set the format and the
            way things should look and we just try to copy exactly
            without looking too similar.Let our competitors do the driving 
and just gradually fall
            further and further back?!!??Alternatively we could try to help 
all our devs by test
            driving the new branch asap.Seek out 'bugs' or anything
            vaguely wonky.Post bug reports.Find work-arounds.Fall back on 
the more stable release from the older branch
            (we can have 2 versions installed at once right?) for when
            we need to meet deadlines.The question is do we want LO to fall 
behind and become
            increasingly irrelevant or are we ready to help push out
            into the world?Do we want LO to keep going in the future
            or are we happy to be forced into switching back to MSO
            one day?Regards fromTom :)--- OnWed, 17/10/12, Dr. R. O 
Stapfreinhold@stapf-online.comwrote:From: Dr. R. O 
Stapfreinhold@stapf-online.comSubject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Indexing for 
Search not
              working?To:users@global.libreoffice.orgDate: Wednesday, 17 
October, 2012, 8:44On 17.10.2012 16:07, Pertti Rnnberg wrote:BRAVO 
Anne-Ology!!Exactly that message - only in other words -- I
                have repeatedly tried to tell to the LibO-experts
                (devs) since January:they must take a brake in developing 
and take a
                certain version (e.g. 3.4.xx) and make every module of
                the suite - Base included - absolutely free of bugs
                and inconsistencies both in programming and the
                instructions and especially the LibO-Help.Every feature 
shall have a clear explanation and
                a detailed guiding how-to in the LibO-Help -- easily
                understood by any average non-expert user.I cannot agree 
more.I started with 3.5.4 a few month ago and saw some
                problems disappearing in3.5.5 and 3.5.6. Currently I
                am hesitating to upgrade to 3.5.7.I hope the dev-team 
listens to Pertti's words.-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: 
users+help@global.libreoffice.orgProblems?http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/Posting 
guidelines + more:http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/NetiquetteList 
archive:http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/All messages sent 
to this list will be publicly
                archived and cannot be deleted


-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted


-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted


-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? 
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted