Re: [libreoffice-users] Indexing for Search not working?

Tom,
That info of yours is not only interesting but very important for me as 
an user - and most certainly for others too.
Unfortunately you add that "it is how you imagine it works"!

Would it be possible that you check that with the board or the devs 
themselves and then confirm it to us?
If I were you I definitely would like to be sure about the proceedings - 
(a) if such really has been settled or  (b) if not settled?

Some posts ago I asked what version is for the time being considered the 
most reliable, especially regarding Base?
-- and what version of JRE is in that version needed for Base (if 
anymore needed)?
I have read the release notes and got an picture but what is your opinion?
My version now is LibO3.4.6 on Win7Pro/32 and Win7/64.
Pertti Rönnberg


On 18.10.2012 12:41, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> The upgrade from 3.5.x to 3.5.7 is extremely unlikely to cause problems.  That 3rd digit is roughly like a 
> "Service Pack" number, but divide it by 2 because MS only does 3 SPs whereas LO does 6 or 7.
>
> The 3.x.7 aims at avoiding introducing new features!  New features are mostly in the 3.6.x or being 
> lined-up for the 3.7.0.  The 3.5.7 is likely to just have fixes for any lingering problems in the 
> 3.5.6.  Most of those fixes will be being merging into the 3.6.3 and .4.  At least that's how i 
> imagine it works.  Certainly once that 3rd digit reaches .4 the branch seems a lot  more stable.
>
> Regards from
> Tom :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > ________________________________
> > From: anne-ology <laginnis@gmail.com>
> > To: Dr. R. O Stapf <reinhold@stapf-online.com>
> > Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
> > Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2012, 2:31
> > Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Indexing for Search not working?
> >
> >         and now we're 3  :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Dr. R. O Stapf
> > <reinhold@stapf-online.com>wrote:
> >
> >
> > > On 17.10.2012 16:07, Pertti Rönnberg wrote:
> > >
> > > > BRAVO Anne-Ology!!
> > > > Exactly that message - only in other words -- I have repeatedly tried to
> > > > tell to the LibO-experts (devs) since January:
> > > > they must take a brake in developing and take a certain version (e.g.
> > > > 3.4.xx) and make every module of the suite - Base included - absolutely
> > > > free of bugs and inconsistencies both in programming and the instructions
> > > > and especially the LibO-Help.
> > > > Every feature shall have a clear explanation and a detailed guiding
> > > > how-to in the LibO-Help -- easily understood by any average non-expert
> > > > user.
> > > I cannot agree more.
> > > I started with 3.5.4 a few month ago and saw some problems disappearing in
> > >    3.5.5 and 3.5.6. Currently I am hesitating to upgrade to 3.5.7.
> > > I hope the dev-team listens to Pertti's words.
> > --
> > For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
> > Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
> > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted