Hi :)
Phew! :) Thanks Dan. So Postgresql and the rest should be fine too [crosses fingers]. It's good
to know i haven't misunderstood or just got it wrong.
Thanks and regards from
Tom :)
________________________________
From: Dan Lewis <elderdanlewis@gmail.com>
To: Tom Davies <tomdavies04@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: "users@global.libreoffice.org" <users@global.libreoffice.org>
Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2012, 15:47
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Indexing for Search not working?
You are right: because Base holds all the data in memory until shutdown, embedded HSQLDB
databases can loss data if shutdown is not done correctly. MySQL keeps the data stored within its
installed folder. Base connects to the MySQL server which accesses the data. The same thing is
true for you favorite MySQL replacement (Mariadb).
--Dan
On 10/18/2012 10:33 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Dan, does that data-loss happen when you use MySql? I thought it only happened with the embedded
HsqlDb?
Regards from
Tom :)
________________________________
From: Dan Lewis <elderdanlewis@gmail.com>
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2012, 15:04
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Indexing for Search not working?
As far as Base is concerned, I have not been having
any problems with 3.4.6, 3.5.6, nor 3.6.2. (I just
installed 3.6.3.2 which is a release candidate. For my
personal databases I use the most, I use MySQL as the
backend with any of these LO Base versions as the front
end. I work with Base 3.6.3.2 for my writing. This
database is embedded and contains only sample data (no
important data contained in it). As far as JRE, I use
1.6.0_24 (openjdk). LO seems to prefer this.
I also use AOO 3.4.1 at times. It seems to prefer
the Openjdk 1.7.0_07.
The main problem with Base is the potential for data
loss when the program is not shutdown properly. This can
be avoided by extracting the data from the database file
and then use Base to connect to the data. (The data
files are extracted to a separate folder.)
Unfortunately, it does not improve the speed of Base.
--Dan
On 10/18/2012 07:15 AM, Pertti Rönnberg wrote:
Tom,
That info of yours is not only interesting but very
important for me as an user - and most certainly for
others too.
Unfortunately you add that "it is how you imagine
it works"!
Would it be possible that you check that with the
board or the devs themselves and then confirm it to us?
If I were you I definitely would like to be sure
about the proceedings - (a) if such really has been
settled or (b) if not settled?
Some posts ago I asked what version is for the time
being considered the most reliable, especially regarding
Base?
-- and what version of JRE is in that version
needed for Base (if anymore needed)?
I have read the release notes and got an picture
but what is your opinion?
My version now is LibO3.4.6 on Win7Pro/32 and
Win7/64.
Pertti Rönnberg
On 18.10.2012 12:41, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
The upgrade from 3.5.x to 3.5.7 is extremely
unlikely to cause problems. That 3rd digit is roughly
like a "Service Pack" number, but divide it by 2 because
MS only does 3 SPs whereas LO does 6 or 7.
The 3.x.7 aims at avoiding introducing new
features! New features are mostly in the 3.6.x or being
lined-up for the 3.7.0. The 3.5.7 is likely to just
have fixes for any lingering problems in the 3.5.6.
Most of those fixes will be being merging into the 3.6.3
and .4. At least that's how i imagine it works.
Certainly once that 3rd digit reaches .4 the branch
seems a lot more stable.
Regards from
Tom :)
________________________________
From: anne-ology <laginnis@gmail.com>
To: Dr. R. O Stapf <reinhold@stapf-online.com>
Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Thursday, 18 October 2012, 2:31
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Indexing
for Search not working?
and now we're 3 :-)
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Dr. R. O
Stapf
<reinhold@stapf-online.com>wrote:
On 17.10.2012 16:07, Pertti Rönnberg
wrote:
BRAVO Anne-Ology!!
Exactly that message - only in
other words -- I have repeatedly tried to
tell to the LibO-experts (devs)
since January:
they must take a brake in
developing and take a certain version (e.g.
3.4.xx) and make every module of
the suite - Base included - absolutely
free of bugs and inconsistencies
both in programming and the instructions
and especially the LibO-Help.
Every feature shall have a clear
explanation and a detailed guiding
how-to in the LibO-Help -- easily
understood by any average non-expert
user.
I cannot agree more.
I started with 3.5.4 a few month ago
and saw some problems disappearing in
3.5.5 and 3.5.6. Currently I am
hesitating to upgrade to 3.5.7.
I hope the dev-team listens to Pertti's
words.
-- For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be
publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-users] Indexing for Search not working? (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.