Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Hello Joep,
Thank you for your reply.
I am happy to say I had the privilege to in business visit your very beautiful and interesting country - and especially Amsterdam - some times very, very many years ago. I am also retired since ten years back and used to work on manager level in some companies mostly in metal industry, planning and delivering plants. But not IT, I am an IT consumer since early 1980 - so you surely know that IT field from 'inside' better than me but I know quite well the decision making in my former environments.

I have for years been very well aware of all what you say about MS's behavior and marketing policy - I agree with you completely and do dislike the situation as much as you. In many (most) companies/organizations (other than IT) the managers have quite little own knowledge in IT why they do not have many alternatives: they have to buy the IT from outside (more or less) experts or build up a IT-dept of their own. In both cases they have to rely on other people's knowhow and recommendations. And if all (95% ?) your important contacts, customers, officials, private, etc. use Windows, and all of your own staff know (only) Windows/MSO then the economic calculation says that you must "talk the same language" -- you can not afford anything else.

I strongly disagree with you about Jay's and Wolfgang' s behavior - take a look at my parallel post "MS problems" some minutes earlier. If these managers concentrate on their own jobs - and buy the IT - it does not qualify them to be called "IT-illiteral morons" as Jay and Wolfgang did.

In 30 years I have had no problems (!) with the Windows' programs (the cost are a relative matter), but from January this year when installing LibO I have had too much problems with Base (and Calc) - and according to this list there are a lot of others having real problems with LibO too. In my opinion there is only one way for LibO: to become in every way better than MSO especially for ordinary private users, user friendly, stable, reliable, free of bugs and problems. These will then make it easier for companies to convert to OpenSource/LibO.
Best regards
Pertti Rönnberg (Finland)
The End!

On 1.10.2012 13:51, Joep L. Blom wrote:
On 01-10-12 11:57, Pertti Rönnberg wrote:
Dear Wolfgang & Jay,
A.    so in your opinion people - both young and old - not yet knowing
anything about computers, perhaps buying their first unit, are - not
only "IT-illiterate" but also "morons"

B.    so you agree that among these "IT-illiterate morons (= idiots)"
are bosses, persons in chief position (managers).
When responsible for their dept's/company's strategic and operative
effectiveness and economical result, these "IT-illiterate morons" decide
about the need of an IT-department -- and employ an IT-manager to that
department to take care of the company's IT-system, programs and
personnel included.
Are you not barking at a wrong tree - is it not this your IT-superior
you should bark at?
I take it obvious that neither of you can be in a manager position.

C.   Obviously you qualify yourselves as highly  "IT-literate" --
perhaps even  "non-morons".
Some weeks ago LibO invited people to take part to make LibO better.
Would it not be an good idea that you - instead of blaming others - took
the opportunity to practice your high quality IT-knowledge to the
benefit of LibO.
Best regards
Pertti Rönnberg

As a Dutch (now retired) manager of a small business in IT I must disagree. Yes, Jay and Wolfgang are not very polite but they surely are right. I won't call them "morons" or "idiots" but choosers for safety on false grounds. Don't forget a salesman in a computer-shop will never tell a person that he could use Open Source software when he can sell him buggy Microsoft software with a profit of > 30%. He will tell him that on his computer only certified Microsoft software will work correctly. You and I know its complete nonsense but an IT-illiterate layman - especially those that are afraid of everything technical - believes him. The same goes for managers with even less interest in technical matters and a willing ear for equals who sells him there stuff. It is not for nothing that governments (Peru, Germany and many others) demand the use of Open Source software instead of the use of closed source, dangerous and expensive software. Twenty years ago the hard- and software world was completely different and there Microsoft has made his largest impact using unlawful methods to make everybody believe their software was the only one to be used.A small governmental action contrary was when the European Committee forced Microsoft to pay a fine of > $ 500,000 and to remove Internet explorer as integral part of their OS. But the main objection against the activities of Microsoft remain valid: the disinformation of managers and decisional people on the fact that they have to pay yearly for service not delivered. Since 1981 when Microsoft began to SELL software the buyer owned the software. Now Microsoft want to steal the ownership from the buyer by stating that the software is not bought but leased. That is wrong. Software running on a remote system not owned by the buyer - and running only there - can be leased just as installed software on a leased system. In all other cases the software is owned. Moreover, when I buy a car and after a day my car is broken in due to an unreliable lock, I get all refunded. Tell that to Microsoft!!

For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.