I think the market share of MSO has nothing to do with the users
being idiots or not. The 90% share is caused by 3 things
2 - Not many people know about alternatives.
That's what I call ignorance. Ignorance plus unwillingness to inform
oneself to remedy that ignorance equals idiocy.
I don't have anything against idiots, as long as they don't impose
their idiocy onto me.
3 - Many IT departments in companies choose MSO because it is easily
available and they consider the support as good.
IT departments, just like "managers" "choose" (in fact, they don't
choose at all) MS because it's not them who have to do the actual
work, so they can't have a clue. And because they're too lazy and
ignorant to get some input from the information workers who have to do
the actual work.
Keep in mind that introduction of an alternative suit requires a lot
of testing in an IT department. The suit must be stable and keep
With MS products, user productivity will be minimised compared to all
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy