On Saturday, October 06, 2012 11:36:38 AM Jay Lozier wrote:
On 10/06/2012 03:57 AM, Dr. R. O Stapf wrote:
I think the market share of MSO has nothing to do with the users being
idiots or not. The 90% share is caused by 3 things
1 - When you buy a PC you often get the MSO already pre-installed
2 - Not many people know about alternatives. I only learned about OO
and LO from my brother who is a IT wizard. While talking to people
about me utilization of LO I am always experiecing that almost all
people do not know about OO or LO or other packages.
3 - Many IT departments in companies choose MSO because it is easily
available and they consider the support as good. Keep in mind that
introduction of an alternative suit requires a lot of testing in an IT
department. The suit must be stable and keep productivity high.
Some of the IT departments I had to work with convinced me the average
tech person in the department knew less about computers in general than
I did. Not that I necessarily know that much. I can remember trying to
solve a networking problem according to my then employer's IT staff and
nothing worked. Eventually, they found that the hardware and software
they had specified did work well together. My sarcastic engineering
comment was to ask if they had bothered to read both spec sheets; I was
working in chemical process engineering then and reading spec sheets was
a mandatory practice for us to avoid killing innocent people.
Another problem is that it is often easier in many companies to get
approval to buy/install from a "name brand" than from someone who is not
a "name brand". MS, Apple, Dell, HP, and Intel are "name brands" and it
is presumed safe to buy from them. A superior product may not get
installed/bought because of this mindset. In the 70's and 80's the joke
was "no one got fired for buying IBM" even if their product was the
worst in the market segment because of the brand image of IBM.
This statement goes back further than that. i remember it in the 60's. There
were far superior systems than IBM at that time, but the company bought IBM,
mainly because of the above statement.
If my above statements are wrong, then I am happy because I converted
from MSO to LO, thus from an idiot to something else...
On 2012-10-06 01:12, Wolfgang Keller wrote:
If MSO is a 90% market leader all its users cannot be complete idiots.
openSUSE 12.2(Linux 3.4.6-2.10-desktop x86_64)|
KDE 4.8.5 "release 521"|Intel core2duo 2.5 MHZ,|8GB DDR3|GeForce
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy