Re: [libreoffice-l10n] l10n of LibreOffice 3.3.1

Hi all,
On 03/02/2011 18:12, Andras Timar wrote:
> Hi Sophie,
>
> > so I've checked my old m83 OOofiles using pocompendium, then pomigrate, then
> > pocount on the new files.
> > Here is what I get
> >
> > TOTAL:
> > type              strings      words (source)    words (translation)
> > translated:   71873 ( 96%)     523148 ( 97%)          581661
> > fuzzy:          276 (  0%)       1305 (  0%)             n/a
> > untranslated:  2097 (  2%)       9456 (  1%)             n/a
> > Total:        74246            533909                 581661
> >
> > File count:     283
> > Does it sound reasonable?
>
> It does. You did not add lo-build-fr.po to your compendium, did you?
>
> > Now to get a full set of .po files for LibO I need to merge the LibreOffice
> > 3.3.x specific files that are on our Pootle repository, right?
>
> Yes, you need to add lo-build-fr.po to your compendium, before you
> update the tree.

so I did:
pocompendium checked.po -d m84 lo-build-fr.po
where m84 is my old OOo po files directory
then
pomigrate -F -C checked.po libo33x-new pot

then I get a directory containing 533909 source words in 283 files which 
is different than the DA files in Pootle which contains 534013 source 
words.
I've no idea where I lose those words. However, if I check with Stuart 
files (en-GB) I get the same number of source words (the only difference 
is that I've a lot of untranslated strings). May be is it because of 
nlpsolver strings?
Am I doing something wrong or can I go on and translate the remaining 
strings of my migration?

Thanks in advance
Kind regards
Sophie
--
Founding member of The Document Foundation

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to l10n+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/l10n/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***