Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 02:30:33PM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > -2 means I oppose the 'idea' of the patch. no amount of tweaking can
> > address my concerns.. one could use a -2 on a technically perfectly
> > valid/correct patch that remove dbaccess from libreoffice for
> > instance. -2 is effectively a veto because it is a sticky state that
> > remain even if a new version of the patch is uploaded... so as long as
> > there is a -2 one cannot Submit the patch, short of hacking gerrit or
> > pushing the patch directly to master, by-passsing gerrit-review
> > altogether.
>
> Can we maybe make the text:
> "There are concerns about the intend or implications of this change that need
> clarification. Please do not merge this before consensus is reached by
> discussion."

there is a hard limit of 50 chars.