Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Eike Rathke <erack@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday, 2013-02-15 14:30:33 -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>
> > -2 is effectively a veto because it is a sticky state that
> > remain even if a new version of the patch is uploaded... so as long as
> > there is a -2 one cannot Submit the patch, short of hacking gerrit or
> > pushing the patch directly to master, by-passsing gerrit-review
> > altogether.
>
> And of course the "clean" solution, a -2 can also be reverted by the
> reviewer who issued the -2 if the follow-up patch addresses the
> concerns.

If the concerns are addressable (other than by 'do not do that') then
that should have been a -1 to start with

which is enough to block _that_ version of the patch from going through.

Norbert