Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Joed, Phil, all,

jlopez777 schrieb:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Phil Jackson<sapient@clear.net.nz>  wrote:

Hi JL

We need to have some sort of structured approach.  So any suggestions are
welcome - wiki or whatever.


I think a wiki could work, I can get one up.

You probably know that we have a wiki exactly for this (and other) purpose(s):

http://wiki.documentfoundation.org

There is already a whiteboard area to work on such topics:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Whiteboards

Of course this area needs some thorough polishing (categories, links to single pages for each topic ...), but here would be the best place to start with the general collection not only of ideas but also on defining the goals and the way to reach them.



Is there some sort of tool we can use to poll members easily so we can get
an accurate idea of what ideas are popular and what are not?

UX doesn't mean to poll members, but to get an idea what all our user use and think - while the majority of them has never been able to join a discussion on a mailing list (and thus all our contributions in this area are just input from one very small group inside our user base).

Björn proposed some time ago to introduce a facebook group where user can provide their feedback to certain topics - such an area would reach even more people than just our mailing list or wiki.


at the most basic sense, we can do a google docs form and make it public and
link it to the wiki.

There already have been discussions on adding a voting extension to the wiki - don't know at the moment how far this has gone. Someone might ask at the website list about this...


We can make this a really democratic approach if is this is possible.

Don't know what you mean by "democratic" here. Of course we need the feedback of our user base. But decisions about implementation (or proposals for implementation) should not be based on such data alone.

Effort and work for implementation, impact on existing users, marketing consequences and our mission with platform independency are just a few points that have to be taken into account.

Sorry, democracy can only work, if all the people involved in the democratic decisions have the same information and understand it's importance to the entire community and our users...


I think we can to a certain degree. As long as we don't get stuck on syntax
on questions for the polling, we would be okay. Obviously, we will have to
take some sort of liberty of the starting point for how we frame the
questions.

Of course - the only point to remember is what happened, when Renaissance started their work: They had to repeat every now and then that they don't copy MS ribbons - but they didn't manage to get the message through, that their approach is independent and different.


Otherwise does someone have a website page they can set up that design
members access and register their support for specific initiatives? This
would make it transparent to all.

I don't understand this question at all.

What we need is to define possible solutions for the question how to provide context sensitive menus along with an easy access to all the (other) menus (probably static).

We have to discuss these solutions and find out the best ones for LibreOffice.

I don't see how these tasks can become easier with simple votes.

You can vote here on the list on questions where a simple yes/no can help to find a common agreement. But for such a complex topic this is certainly the wrong tool.

In the present format we are not as effective as there are no formal
procedures or structures in place. [...]

You're right. Can you just create a wiki page proposing some procedures and structures?

Based on such a page we can discuss and define the necessary structures - and it may serve as information for new team members too.

Best regards

Bernhard

PS: I removed the long tail of old mails not relevant to this part of the discussion and changed the subject to a more appropriate topic.

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.