Hi Ivan, Christoph, all,
Ivan M. schrieb:
Hi Christoph, all,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Christoph Noack
<christoph@dogmatux.com> wrote:
Hi all!
[...]
I tried to "play around" with the Base icon during the last two days,
but it is pretty difficult. I fell back to the original "stack" idea,
since it is rather hard to include all the database relations and the
objects and keeping a unique and easy-to-identify look.
[...]
Now, I'm curious how you perceive the "background" idea for the 128px
icon. I've added it to get a more or less harmonic style ... considering
Writer and Calc. Unfortunately, the icons start to differ given their
level of detail (per size).
Before I get into feedback mode, I want to say thank you for
continuing to work on these icons - it's great to see the progress!
Now, let's switch to feedback mode: I'm not sure that the binary
background works well as a metaphor. Of course, everything on
computers is, in the end, binary, but AFAIK, Base involves no more or
less binary than Writer, Calc, Draw ... at least, I hope it's a
program people can use without touching binary! Maybe some SQL code
could be used instead (CREATE TABLE ... SELECT * FROM....)?
Two thoughts about the SQL code:
- We don't use readable text on any other icon. I would like to leave it.
- Base is rather a database front-end, while I think SQL code is more
like a reference to a database in general.
What I tried out is to replace the binary background by a table of
records / datasets:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Base_alternative_icon_proposal.png
I don't know if you consider it to be too near to the spreadsheet icon -
In my eyes it different enough for a background with accent on the
content in opposition to the borders in Calc.
I also think the 128x128 version adds some unnecessary complexity by
making space between the stacked cylinders... maybe add a fourth one
instead?
Christoph replaced this already in his proposal.
To really nitpick, I wonder if the 48x48 icon couldn't have a slightly
thicker border for the stack as it looks very thin against the thick
outer border of the icon.
Does it look better now?
As for the colors, I wonder if we couldn't find a compromise between
colorless and colorful icons by changing the color of the inner border
(which is gray in the colorless version). What I mean is: having a
gray or white inner border like the colorless icon coupled with the
colored gradient fill of the colorful icon? What do you think?
This doesn't work with the present icons, as the colorless inner area is
just a semi-transparent gradient on the grey background.
Adding the color back to the the inner border would mean to re-establish
the colorful inner area as well.
When the first version of the icons is ready, we can try to separate the
inner area from the inner border.
Best regards
Bernhard
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Context
Re: [libreoffice-design] MimeType icons - template · Nik
Re: [libreoffice-design] MimeType icons - template · Christoph Noack
Re: [libreoffice-design] MimeType icons - template · Nik
Re: [libreoffice-design] MimeType icons - template · Christoph Noack
Re: [libreoffice-design] MimeType icons - template · Christoph Noack
Re: [libreoffice-design] MimeType icons - template · Jaron Kuppers
Re: [libreoffice-design] MimeType icons - template · Bernhard Dippold
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.