[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMS


Le 2010-10-20 11:52, Christian Lohmaier a écrit :
Hi Benjamin, *,

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:17 AM, Benjamin Horst<bhorst@mac.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Benjamin Horst<bhorst@mac.com> wrote:
On Oct 18, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Benjamin Horst<bhorst@mac.com> wrote:

Those who have said this were envisioning far more complex sites than I believe you were
imagining. To replicate the current static site will not require a great deal of configuration
whatsoever.

I know I'm repeating myself, but still the drupal site doesn't cut it.
You canot create structured documents with headings for example.

Yes, I know, this is "just a configuration setting"; but despite admin
logins being available know, nobody took the time to add it, despite
so many drupal people advocating it here on the list.


In my opinion, Christian does have a point here. Could someone please create this as proof that it can be done? I'll take a look at it although I am more adept at the Zikula packages. Also, in all fairness, Christian, you should log into the Drupal site and attempt to create these documents to see how they compare to Silverstripe.

I think the exercise here is to collect interested and competent users/devs who were asked (by André) to offer the choice of the best CMS possible for the TDF/LibO website. So, after advocating each preferred choice, we have narrowed it down to Silverstripe and Drupal. This is done. Now we all have the task of taking a closer look, without any prejudice of the suite, at each CMS and test out their virtues and shortfalls.

I don't think this is a contest. Let's take a sincere look at both packages and determine which is better for the community.

We now have approx. 2 days to offer a choice to the SC after which they will consider these or the SC will choose by themselves. Judging by their posts on the thread, they are not going to give us an extension and I don't think we need an extension. We can deliver our choice for Friday if we all cooperate.

Marc


--
E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Follow-Ups:
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSChristian Lohmaier <lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSMarc Paré <marc@marcpare.com>
References:
[libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMS"Andre Schnabel" <Andre.Schnabel@gmx.net>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSBenjamin Horst <bhorst@mac.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSChristian Lohmaier <lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSBenjamin Horst <bhorst@mac.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSChristian Lohmaier <lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSBenjamin Horst <bhorst@mac.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSChristian Lohmaier <lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSBenjamin Horst <bhorst@mac.com>
Re: [libreoffice-website] [SC] Decision about CMSChristian Lohmaier <lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com>
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.