Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 06/03/2013 08:21 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi again, just a little clarification:

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Christian Lohmaier
<lohmaier+ooofuture@googlemail.com> wrote:
[...]
"Q41: How does one contact APEWS?
A41: One does not. APEWS does not accept removal request by email,
fax, voicemail or letters. [....]"

The only chance to get unlisted is to:
That should have been: They make it seem so. But this is just a way to
make fun of people.

Don't post there. You *WILL* be flamed, and rightfully so.
As is written on their page as well:
" Note that posting messages in these newsgroups & lists will not have
any effect on APEWS listings, only the discontinuation of spam and/or
spam support will.
Abusing these newsgroups & lists by posting removal request you will
make a fool of yourself and are at risk to end up in additional
private blocklists, so think twice before posting."

So once again: Don't post to those newsgroups!

→ Tell your ISP to stop using APEWS blocklists. Every mail-admin who
uses that lists gives a s*t about its users. Fine if you want to use
it for your own business, if you're offering business to your clients,
using that blacklist is a stupid idea.

Let me put it in stronger words:
Using APEWS blacklist questions your ability to run services for other people.
And this is of course still true.

ciao
Christian


I was told that the company who leased the IP address to LO is the one that needs to contact APEWS. I would not use email to do this either. Direct phone to a live person - yes person talking to another over the phone is a rare concept to many people who grew up using free text messaging and email services, but had to pay for the "live" phone calls.

So some tech manager at the IP leasing company talks to the APEWS tech people by phone and maybe send faxes back and forth, or other non-email messaging. Then maybe, somehow, APEWS will get the idea that the current company using the IP address is not the people/company who got reported for spam. But if APEWS feels that the owner of the IP address was not doing a proper job in enforcing anti-spam policies, then things will not work out and we need to get a new IP address in the range of the ones we have that are not having these black list issues.



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.