Le 07.08.2014 14:50, Paul a écrit :
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:59:46 +0200
"Charles-H. Schulz" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Le 07.08.2014 09:54, Tom Davies a écrit :
> Hi :)
> (to James's suggestion.)
> I think most people on this mailing list would probably agree with
> the 4.2.6.
That is your own wild call and your own opinion. I don't agree with
you. Many people don't agree with you. Stop saying somebody should
get the version you like.
Again, with all due respect Charles, but I have heard many people on
this list echo that sentiment. It seems to me like every time this
question comes up there are far more people recommending going for the
more stable branch than there are recommending going for the less
branch, if there are even any of those.
Tom's suggestion is far from a wild call, although you are of course
free to disagree with it.
It is a wild call not because it is unreasonable (it isn't) but because
it is peremptory.
Yes, we can read here, on this list, that the newer branch is a problem.
We have read it since several years but I'd like to point out two rather
- the same people complain about the same things for years, right here.
For instance Tom has always said here and elsewhere he was not
understanding the reason of two branches. Noop has always complained
about the two branches and the release pace. It does not make their
opinion invalid, but I'm suggesting a pattern here.
- This list is interesting, because it is one type of location. As it
happens, my main contributions these past months to the project have
been creating and sharing content on social media on behalf of
LibreOffice and TDF (yes I'm the main guy behind the daily tweets). You
would not believe how different the feedback is. True, people report
bugs just like with anything else, but 90% of the time, the people on
the social media are users who keep asking for new features and want
more and more of them. There was to my knowledge, since January 2014
exactly two people who wrote that they experienced a bug (with the newer
branch) and were switching back to the older one. And we get feedback
everyday from several different people, so that could give you an idea
of the volume we're dealing here with.
What am I trying to show here?
Certainly not that people on social media are "more right" than people
here. But that the opinions diverge with demographics, the place, the
crowds, the kind of usage, etc. Indeed here, everytime this question
arises, the same people will repeat the same arguments. It does not make
their opinions unfair or inaccurate; but an echo chamber is also very
easy to form on the Internet, esp. on a mailing list. Last but not
least, positive feedback is rare compared to negative - here, in FOSS or
in any customer service. I'd be shocked it we experienced the opposite
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
(message not available)
- RE: [libreoffice-users] What version? (continued)
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy