On 7 août 2014 21:02:17 CEST, Pikov Andropov <email@example.com> wrote:
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 8/7/2014 3:05 AM:
On 7 août 2014 01:30:57 CEST, Pikov Andropov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
V Stuart Foote wrote on 8/6/2014 6:34 PM:
No great mystery.
If they are more conservative--LibreOffice 4.2.6 is a solid build,
somewhat lacking in the latest office features.
If they have more tolerance for change, and accept the potential
some as yet undescribed bugs affecting use, then early adoption of
4.3.0 branch is a reasonable choice.
Both are good well tested software packages.
I think you're saying that 4.2.6 is essentially bugfree, but 4.3.x is
Sigh. Both are NOT bugfree. Stable is a stage and no software ca be
I didn't say, bugfree, Charles. I said "essentially bugfree". Don't be
Sorry, I didn't mean to be! I was just trying to clarify those terms.
Envoyé de mon téléphone avec Kaiten Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
To unsubscribe e-mail to: email@example.com
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy