Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi :)
Hopefully just savign the Release Notes pages would do the trick well enough?  
Regards from
Tom :)

--- On Fri, 7/10/11, jorge <jrodriguez17@cpcecr.com> wrote:

From: jorge <jrodriguez17@cpcecr.com>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Working on an archive site/pages for LO and the DVD[s] I have been 
working with
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Friday, 7 October, 2011, 22:48

Hi

    And simple list about bugs solve in 3.4.x and exist in 3.3.x

    Thanks for your idea and job,

Regards,

Jorge Rodríguez
_______________


El vie, 07-10-2011 a las 15:45 -0600, jorge escribió:
Hi

    I think that usually some people refers that 3.3.x is more stable than
3.4.x and say too which is better for workstation and wich for
experimental. But usually forget to explain in simples and few words the
features differences between both that are very necesary to decide what
version we would use.

    I suggest to make a list features that 3.4.x has and hasn't has 3.3.x.
I suggest include a general descripcion about code changes that not take
change in features but yes in efficient.

Regards,

Jorge Rodríguez
_______________


El jue, 06-10-2011 a las 21:12 -0400, webmaster for Kracked Press
Productions escribió:
I have had the idea for a few months now, so I figured it was time to 
start working on it.

The original NA-DVD site has a set of archive pages for the installs 
that went into the NA-DVD[s].  There are all of the OSs and the language 
and help packs that were linked within the "default" install page[s].

This version of the site pages will have the contents of the DVDs, but 
will have installs for:
3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.3.4
3.4.1, 3.4.2, 3.4.3
plus the new ones when they come out.

See what you think.  I need to work on the wording to describe the 
differences between the 3.3.x line and the 3.4.x line.  I could use some 
words to describe what line is best to use where.  I know that soon the 
3.4.x line will be "enterprise ready" and the "most stable" and "cutting 
edge" words soon will not be the best.  Also, when 3.5.x line comes out, 
"most stable" will be describing 3.4.x versions.  So maybe not using 
that phrase would be better for marketing.

http://libreoffice-na.us/multi-version/install.html

Any advice could be helpful.



-- 
Atentamente,

Jorge Rodríguez


-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.