Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 1 Sep 2011 at 13:25, David H. Lipman wrote:

I have analyzed obfuscated Javascripts and viewed deobfuscated
Javascripts that uses a laundry list of vulnerabilities and software
versions in the vulnerability/exploitation attack vector.


What on earth has javascript to do with this issue? This is a JAVA 
issue. Any vulnerabilities in javascript only affect javascript, which 
is a totally different kettle of fish and doesn't even form part of LO.

I remain puzzled by this thread. I have Java 1.6.0.26 installed and 
that works just fine with LO 3.4.3 on Windows XP SP3. The suggestion to 
deliberately install old potentially insecure versions of Java is very 
bad advice, not to mention the copyright infringements of hosting it on 
personal web space.

Dave

http://www.davesergeant.com


-- 
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.