Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index

HI *,

On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Kingswells Computercraft
<> wrote:

It is the main LO icon I'm talking about;  it's not so much what's wrong
with it, so much as what it lacks - as I stated in my original message:

I don't think it is our main Logo that is lacking something - simple
is beautiful :-) - but of course we could need some additional
artwork, like a mascot character..

for details.
I'd love to have a friendly mascot-character

But I don't think that our main logo needs fancy stuff - as mentioned
earlier the simplicitly makes it suitable for easy printing, makes it
easily recognizable. If it was a logo that relied on color, you
couldn't use any background you like, and of course printing would be
either much more expensive or would use monochrome variant anyway...


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.