Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


All,

Please continue to utilitze The Document Foundation logo as The Libre
Office Logo as The Document Foundation is the body that runs and overseas
LibreOffice. With this Logo please also include the OASIS Logo and a ODF
1.x version stamping in The Document Foundation Logo to show the current
maximum ODF version supported in that particular version of LibreOffice to
help foster the adoption of ISO standards for interoperability in a Open
Source developement model to lower total cost of ownership in all areas.
The Document Foundation with ODF version stamp integrated logo is to me the
best choice to represent this software. Including an OASIS Logo and
possibly an ISO logo for ODF on the welcome/startup screen may assist with
awareness of open standards and open source.



Thank you

*Mr.* *Timothy M. Butterworth USAF H.D. SSgt*

Constitutionalist and defender of The Separation of Church and State
because “Our freedom was not free and freedom cannot defend itself but it
is always worth defending with our lives”

Email: timothy.m.butterworth@gmail.com

Google+: Timothy Butterworth *
http://tinyurl.com/timothy-butterworth-google-p*
Current USA Government Petitions descriptions and Links:
USA-Gov-Petitions<https://plus.google.com/u/0/103876270184205766391/posts/RqTsJQuVq6X>


Brainbench <http://www.brainbench.com/xml/bb/homepage.xml>

Brainbench Transcript ID: 10486539



*Cisco Systems Inc.
*<http://www.cisco.com/?POSITION=SEM&COUNTRY_SITE=us&CAMPAIGN=HN&CREATIVE=Brand+-+Tier+1_Cisco&REFERRING_SITE=Unified&KEYWORD=cisco%7cmkwid_ezYIyKDtI_1132427916_0v0xx7y7d0>
Cisco ID CSCO11235801
Cisco Certified Network Associate, CCNA, Certified July 10, 2007, Expired
July 10, 2010

Cisco Certification Tracking
System<http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/le3/le11/learning_certification_tracking_system.html>



*Computing Technology Industry Association
CompTIA*<http://www.comptia.org/home.aspx>
Career ID#: COMP001007016298, Verification ID# HQQP3JTC2NR4QFXS

Convergence+ Certified Professional, Certified 06/Nov/2009
Linux+ Certified Professional, Certified 1/May/2009
Network+ Certified Professional, Certified 18/Apr/2008
RFID+ Certified Professional, Certified 8/Jan/2010
Security+ Certified Professional, Certified 14/Mar/2008
Server+ Certified Professional, Certified 03/Jul/2009

CompTIA Certification Transcript
Verification<https://www.certmetrics.com/comptia/public/transcript.aspx?transcript=HQQP3JTC2NR4QFXS>

*Certified Wireless Network Professionals CWNP <http://www.cwnp.com/>*

CWNP ID: CWNP446044
Certified Wireless Technology Specialist CWTS, Certified 29/Jan/2010, Valid
until 31/Dec/2020
CWNP Certification Verification<http://www.cwnp.com/certifications/verify_cwnp/>




Linux Professional Institute <http://www.lpi.org/>

LPI ID: LPI000200463

Linux Counter <http://linuxcounter.net/>
Linux Counter User Registration ID:
555718<http://linuxcounter.net/user/555718.html>


Free and Open Source Software F/OSS is free as in freedom to improve
availability and reduce the Total Cost of Ownership TCO of software and
firmware though shared maintenance, it is the freedom of interoperable
innovation through shared Research and Development R&D costs, it is the
freedom that allows true piece of mind in procurement because the full
source code is available and it is not free as in closed source freeware or
shareware which often includes software defects and malware.



On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Kingswells Computercraft <
support@kingswellscomputercraft.co.uk> wrote:

Thanks Tom, thanks for listening.  I was beginning to feel like no-one was
listening, or wanted to even consider what I was talking about.  Not a
pleasant experience in my first attempt to contribute.

Thanks too, Christian, you seem to "get" what I mean.  On some of the
links I followed from your reply, I found an excellent example of what I
think would do justice to the LO icon - it was/is a proposal from Andy
Fitzsimon for the web-page artwork - his "Dove" carries the symbolism of
freedom, and maybe even a nod to the old "seagulls".

I've knocked up an icon (attached) combining the current "TDF" icon and
Mr. Fitzsimon's dove to see what people think - I hope I haven't broken any
rules by doing this!  This is what I mean by making the icon
"eye-catching".  I think this simple addition makes it "jump out", and
everything else I was talking about.


Best Regards,
        Alistair Bain
Kingswells Computercraft
Aberdeen, Scotland

On 01/11/2012 16:00, Tom Davies wrote:

Hi :)
I hate to break it to you bud but you are not an outsider!  You joined
the club in your first post and probably even before that.

It is good to hear a different point of view particularly if it's likely
to open our eyes a bit to the way at least some (probably loads of) real
outsiders might view us.
Regards from
Tom :)


    ------------------------------**------------------------------**
------------
    *From:* Kingswells Computercraft <support@**
kingswellscomputercraft.co.uk <support@kingswellscomputercraft.co.uk>>
    *To:* Florian Monfort <florian.monfort@gmail.com>
    *Cc:* design@global.libreoffice.org; marketing@global.libreoffice.**
org <marketing@global.libreoffice.org>
    *Sent:* Thursday, 1 November 2012, 0:46
    *Subject:* [libreoffice-marketing] Re: LibreOffice Icon

    Hello Florian,

    It is the main LO icon I'm talking about;  it's not so much what's
    wrong with it, so much as what it lacks - as I stated in my original
    message:

     > I am writing to you today to plead with you to change the main
    program
     > icon currently in use for LibreOffice as I believe it is seriously
     > underwhelming!
     > As an icon for the Document Foundation it says it all to me -
    clear, > simple, document.  However, considering it as the "flag" or
     > "packaging" for LibreOffice, it is (IMHO) far too bland:
     >
     > • It is not easy to pick out among hordes of other icons
     > • It lacks colour and warmth, is not striking or eye-catching
     > • It says nothing about the elegance and sophistication of
    LibreOffice
     > • It doesn't inspire confidence.

    I must admit I am only used to seeing it on Windows systems - even
    the "blank" default icon in Windows (any version) has more character
    to it than the current LibreOffice icon!

    I appreciate that the individual programs within LO have more
    colourful icons, with embellishments particular to that app, but
    when installing on Windows systems the option to have a desktop icon
    is only the main icon, the Document Foundation icon.  As I said
    before, I think this icon is fine for the Document Foundation, but
    LO I think needs much more.  In terms of marketing, it is almost as
    if the wrapper for the product were blank!  Imagine if this were a
    magazine on a table in a waiting room - would you pick up a blank
    sheet of paper, or one of the more recognisable covers, e.g.
    National Geographic, Time, or Reader's Digest?

    Take as examples of other programs, Firefox and Thunderbird - easily
    recognisable icons to a wide audience, but the organisation behind
    it, Mozilla, has a completely different icon, and probably also much
    more obscure to most people.

    As a mainstream user, and one who wishes only the best for LO, I am
    concerned that LO has a difficult uphill struggle ahead of it in
    order to gain the recognition from the general public (and therefore
    the survivability) that it deserves.  It is really unfortunate that
    in the split from Oracle, they retained the recognition (and even
    kudos) gained over all the previous years of work on OOo.  As I see
    it, LO has, in the eyes of the general populous, been "divorced"
    from its heritage, and to all intents and purposes (to the
    uninitiated) looks like a newcomer on the scene!  I believe that LO
    needs and deserves a beautiful icon for the main program, which says
    something about the elegance and sophistication which lies within.
    This would also serve to foster the "brand image" of LO in the eyes
    of the general public (as opposed to the brand of the Document
    Foundation).

    I can appreciate too, that to many of you guys and girls within the
    Document Foundation community it may be difficult to understand what
    I'm getting at;  maybe being so close and intimately involved in the
    whole project means it is not easy to step back and see it in the
    same way an outsider does.  I think it is fair to say that Linux (in
    many of its flavours) suffers from a "club members only" sort of
    image, which has probably done a lot to stifle its uptake by the
    general public, and I fear that LO may slip into a similar
    category.  That would be a great pity indeed.  I hope that perhaps
    my perspective may be of use to you in this regard, and give an
    "outsider" view that you may otherwise find difficult to attain.


    Best Regards,
         Alistair Bain
    Kingswells Computercraft
    Aberdeen, Scotland


    On 31/10/2012 15:06, Florian Monfort wrote:
     > I actually think the logo is pretty good.
     >
     > - The absence of vivid colors makes it easy to adapt to any
    platform design
     > standard.
     > - Simple shape makes it easy to recognize.
     >
     > What problem is it that you identify with the current logo ?
     >
     > Cheers
     >
     >
     > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Kingswells Computercraft <
     > support@**kingswellscomputercraft.co.uk<support@kingswellscomputercraft.co.uk>
    <mailto:support@**kingswellscomputercraft.co.uk<support@kingswellscomputercraft.co.uk>
**> wrote:
     >
     >> Dear LibreOffice teams,
     >>
     >> My apologies if you have already got my message (below) - I
    tried sending
     >> it a few days ago, but only seem to have succeeded in subscribing
to
     >> mailing lists!
     >>
     >>  From my message below, you can see I believe it is essential
    that the
     >> LibreOffice main icon be replaced by one that aids in the
    recognition and
     >> identity of LibreOffice, which I believe the current one icon
    fails to do.
     >>  From some of the messages I've seen since subscribing (especially
     >> marketing), it now seems to me that it is crucial that the icon
    is replaced.
     >> I would suggest that the following are essential requirements of
    the main
     >> icon for LibreOffice:
     >>
     >>    a) colourful and eye-catching, i.e. an attractive "wrapper".
     >>    b) equals (or at least hints at) the sophistication of the
    program.
     >>    c) something that aids with  "brand" recognition.
     >>
     >> I'm sure it is (and will continue to be) an uphill struggle to
    achieve the
     >> recognition that Apache OpenOffice has automatically inherited
    from its
     >> predecessor.  Without an icon that helps to achieve this, I
    could see a day
     >> when LibreOffice disappears into obscurity, and that would be a
    great pity.
     >>  It wouldn't be the first time a great product has failed, not
    because it
     >> was unworthy, but it didn't have the recognition (and therefore
the
     >> following) necessary to carry it forward.
     >>
     >> Best regards,
     >>      Alistair Bain
     >> Kingswells Computercraft
     >> Aberdeen, Scotland
     >>
     >>
     >> -------- Original Message --------
     >> Subject:        Re: LibreOffice Icon
     >> Date:         Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:50:31 +0200
     >> From:          Florian Effenberger
    <floeff@documentfoundation.org <mailto:floeff@**
documentfoundation.org <floeff@documentfoundation.org>>**>
     >> Organisation:  The Document Foundation
     >> To:    Kingswells Computercraft
    <support@**kingswellscomputerc**raft.co.uk<http://kingswellscomputercraft.co.uk>
<support@**kingswellscomputercraft.co.uk<support@kingswellscomputercraft.co.uk>
    <mailto:support@**kingswellscomputercraft.co.uk<support@kingswellscomputercraft.co.uk>
**>
     >>>
     >> CC: info@documentfoundation.org <mailto:info@**
documentfoundation.org <info@documentfoundation.org>>
     >>
     >> Hello,
     >>
     >> thank you very much for your feedback and interest in
    LibreOffice! The
     >> topic you raise fits very well for our design team, and I strongly
     >> propose you get in touch with them directly.
     >>
     >> All information as well as the official mailing list is available
at
     >>
    
http://www.libreoffice.org/****get-involved/ux-visual-****designers/<http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-involved/ux-visual-**designers/>
<http://www.**libreoffice.org/get-involved/**ux-visual-designers/<http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/ux-visual-designers/>

     >>
     >> Thanks again,
     >> Florian
     >>
     >> Kingswells Computercraft wrote on 2012-10-11 10:41:
     >>
     >>> Dear Document Foundation,
     >>>
     >>> First, thank you so much for LibreOffice!  I have been a user
since
     >>> OpenOffice.org version 1.1.2, and I have recommended it to many
    friends
     >>> and customers over the years.  I recognise LibreOffice to be the
     >>> legitimate successor to the earlier OpenOffice.org, and believe
    it to be
     >>> a better suite than the Oracle/Apache's version (I used both
until
     >>> recently).
     >>>
     >>> I am writing to you today to plead with you to change the main
    program
     >>> icon currently in use for LibreOffice as I believe it is
seriously
     >>> underwhelming!  As an icon for the Document Foundation it says
    it all to
     >>> me - clear, simple, document.  However, considering it as the
    "flag" or
     >>> "packaging" for LibreOffice, it is far too bland:
     >>>
     >>>    • It is not easy to pick out among hordes of other icons
     >>>    • It lacks colour and warmth, is not striking or eye-catching
     >>>    • It says nothing about the elegance and sophistication of
    LibreOffice
     >>>   • It doesn't inspire confidence.
     >>>
     >>> In my experience I often introduce LibreOffice as an alternative
to
     >>> Microsoft Office to people who have never heard of it before.
    To these
     >>> new users, the desktop icon is the "shop window" for the
    application,
     >>> and it is frankly uninspiring!  I have considered replacing the
    desktop
     >>> icon with another (third party) icon, but I am aware that this
    breaches
     >>> your guidelines about branding & icon usage, so I don't want to
    do that.
     >>>
     >>> Please, please change the icon for something that does the
    application
     >>> justice.
     >>>
     >>>
     >>> Best Regards,
     >>>      Alistair Bain
     >>> Kingswells Computercraft
     >>> Aberdeen, Scotland
     >>>
     >>
     >> --
     >> Florian Effenberger, Chairman of the Board (Vorstandsvorsitzender)
     >> Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
     >> The Document Foundation, Zimmerstr. 69, 10117 Berlin, Germany
     >> Gemeinnützige rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
     >> Legal details:
    http://www.documentfoundation.****org/imprint<http://www.**
documentfoundation.org/imprint<http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint>
**>
     >>
     >>
     >>
     >>
     >>
     >> --
     >> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.**
     >> libreoffice.org 
<marketing%2Bhelp@global.**libreoffice.org<marketing%252Bhelp@global.libreoffice.org>
    <mailto:2Bhelp@global.**libreoffice.org<2Bhelp@global.libreoffice.org>

     >> Problems?
    
http://www.libreoffice.org/****get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-****<http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**>
     >>
    unsubscribe/<http://www.**libreoffice.org/get-help/**
mailing-lists/how-to-**unsubscribe/<http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/>

     >> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundati**
on.org/** <http://documentfoundation.org/**>
     >> Netiquette 
<http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**Netiquette<http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette>

     >> List archive:
    
http://listarchives.**libreoff**ice.org/global/**marketing/<http://libreoffice.org/global/**marketing/>
<ht**tp://listarchives.libreoffice.**org/global/marketing/<http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/>

     >> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and
    cannot be
     >> deleted
     >>
     >
     >
     >

    -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
    marketing+help@global.**libreoffice.org<marketing%2Bhelp@global.libreoffice.org>
    <mailto:help@global.**libreoffice.org <help@global.libreoffice.org>>
    Problems?
    http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
unsubscribe/<http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/>
    Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**
Netiquette <http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette>
    List archive: http://listarchives.**libreoffice.org/global/**
marketing/ <http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/>
    All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot
    be deleted




--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.**
libreoffice.org <marketing%2Bhelp@global.libreoffice.org>
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/**get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-**
unsubscribe/<http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/>
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.**documentfoundation.org/**
Netiquette <http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette>
List archive: 
http://listarchives.**libreoffice.org/global/**marketing/<http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/>
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.