2013/7/23 Yury Tarasievich <email@example.com>:
Would such comment be a solution, really?
For one, PO fileset is local. Work put there is being constantly lost, if
Now, is there a POT fileset serving as the root source of English strings?
Is one Andras publishes such root source?
Or is there one more root-ish than that?
A pot file can contain an English/source comment, a po file keeps that
comment and can add/edit a localized version or comment to that
So I think that would be the solution for those few tricky strings.
I just hope that when pot files are generated they would also get the
comment from the code i.e. the comment for pot file should be included
with the original string in the code. Someone correct me if I am
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Fwd: Re: issue 67093: mix between Title and Header in various l10n · Mihovil Stanic
- Re: [libreoffice-l10n] mix between Title and Header in various l10n - veto thing (continued)
- Re: [libreoffice-l10n] mix between Title and Header in various l10n - veto thing · Martin Srebotnjak
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy