Re: AW: [EXTERN]-Re[6]: Building LO from source

Thanks Julian,

I now checked my system and Java Options under Advanced tab is unchecked 
and that panel is passive. Thus, I cannot add or edit any Java 
parameters. Is it related with compile parameters?

Regards

------ Original Message ------
From: "Kalinowski, Julian" <julian.kalinowski@dataport.de>
To: "Ismet Bahadir" <ismetbahadir@gmail.com>; "Regis Perdreau" 
<regis.perdreau@gmail.com>; "libreoffice-dev" 
<libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org>
Sent: 12-Jun-20 12:09:00 PM
Subject: AW: [EXTERN]-Re[6]: Building LO from source

> Hi,
>
> Regarding your problem installing extensions, I remember having the 
> same Error message when I enabled Java Debugging inside LO to debug 
> extensions.
>
> In Options – Advanced – Parameters (or similar, my UI is in german), I 
> added some java parameters so I can attach a debugger (as described 
> here: 
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_debug#Debugging_Java_components_in_LibreOffice 
> <https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/How_to_debug#Debugging_Java_components_in_LibreOffice>)
>
>
>
> When these options were set and I did NOT have a debugger attached, I 
> got the same error message when trying to install an extension.
>
> So you may check if there are JVM options set and remove them or attach 
> a debugger and try installing your extension again.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Julian
>
>
>
> Von: LibreOffice [mailto:libreoffice-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] Im 
> Auftrag von Ismet Bahadir
> Gesendet: Freitag, 12. Juni 2020 08:42
> An: Regis Perdreau <regis.perdreau@gmail.com>; libreoffice-dev 
> <libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org>
> Betreff: [EXTERN]-Re[6]: Building LO from source
>
>
>
> Hi Regis,
>
>
>
> I didn't use --without-doxygen option. I'll add this, hopefully, it 
> will compile much faster.
>
>
>
> The institution I'm giving LO is asking to remove some of the "apps" 
> that they are not going to use. Those apps may stay in the compiled 
> package, but I don't want users to see those apps. It's like installing 
> MS Office with unchecking MS Access. The office software is still fully 
> functional, but the users can't use or even see Access app. This is 
> what I want to do with LO.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> ------ Original Message ------
>
> From: "Regis Perdreau" <regis.perdreau@gmail.com>
>
> To: "libreoffice-dev" <libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org>
>
> Sent: 12-Jun-20 9:22:06 AM
>
> Subject: Re: Re[4]: Building LO from source
>
>
>
> > HI Ismet,
> >
> > I can confirm (IMHO) that you can't exclude easily some part from LO, 
> > it's not designed in this way...For example, Impress depends from 
> > Draw. You need Calc to embed sheets in Writer, etc...
> >
> > Have you set an autogen.input file to exclude the doxygen 
> > documentation (--without-doxygen) ?...It takes ages on my computer to 
> > be generated.
> >
> > On my computer, a ridiculous core I3-6100 8Go nowadays, it takes 
> > around 2h to compile LO from scratch under Linux.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > Régis Perdreau
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Le ven. 12 juin 2020 à 07:59, Ismet Bahadir <ismetbahadir@gmail.com> a 
> > écrit :
> >
> > > Thank you very much Tor,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, I didn't know the terminology, so I trusted that you would 
> > > understand :)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > It takes over 5 hours to compile on my pc but I have a powerful 
> > > machine with 64 cores and 128 GM ram. I think that will be faster.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'll try and get back to you. But I still do not know why the 
> > > extension successfully installs on Ubuntu but fails on Debian.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------ Original Message ------
> > >
> > > From: "Tor Lillqvist" <tml@iki.fi>
> > >
> > > To: "Ismet Bahadir" <ismetbahadir@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Cc: "Stephan Bergmann" <sbergman@redhat.com>; "libreoffice-dev" 
> > > <libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org>
> > >
> > > Sent: 12-Jun-20 8:55:57 AM
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: Re[2]: Building LO from source
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > I think it's best to recompile the source from scratch with 
> > > > > official DEB
> > > > > packaging system.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > IMHO, as an outsider, only Debian's own way to package LibreOffice 
> > > > can be said to be "official". It is *very* different from the way 
> > > > TDF packages LibreOffice in the .deb format.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > How can I exclude some of the apps such as "Draw"?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Draw (and Writer, Calc, etc) are not "apps" as such IMHO but 
> > > > different kinds of documents that the one same app, LibreOffice, 
> > > > manages using the same soffice.bin process. But that is just 
> > > > terminology, we know what you mean.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Is it possible that
> > > > > each app has its own DEB installation file so that I won't be 
> > > > > installing
> > > > > it if I skip its DEB file?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > That *is* exactly how the real Debian packages for LibreOffice are 
> > > > structured. See https://packages.debian.org/buster/libreoffice Also 
> > > > many (most?) other Linux distros, like Fedora for instance, split 
> > > > LibreOffice into multiple packages, like libreoffice-core, 
> > > > libreoffice-writer, libreoffice-calc, libreoffice-draw, etc.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (As such, I don't think that it makes sense to split up LibreOffice 
> > > > like that, I find it fairly pointless, old-fashioned and needlessly 
> > > > complex, but then I am not a Linux zealot, I like macOS more. But 
> > > > just ignore me here.)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --tml
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > LibreOffice mailing list
> > > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice