Re: A proposal for separate English localization

David Tardon <dtardon -AT- redhat.com>
Mon, 16 Oct 2017 09:08:55 +0200

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:31:41PM +0000, Kaganski Mike wrote:

3. Any change in English translation (not in immutable source strings!) 
would trigger all other translations of this string to become fuzzy 
(thus not loosing previous translation, but just signaling the 
requirement to review).


Wouldn't it be better to aim just for this and skip the hassle of adding
a separate English translation?

D.

Context

Re: A proposal for separate English localization (continued)
- Re: A proposal for separate English localization · David Tardon
  - Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Kaganski Mike
    - Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Eike Rathke
- Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Sophie
  - Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Kaganski Mike
    - Re: A proposal for separate English localization · Sophie

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.